Trial reportMedicine2019
Dose-related healing of artificial ulcers after endoscopic submucosal dissection using esomeprazole: A randomized controlled study.
Trial report in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Controlled hypertension under hemostasis prevents post-gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection bleeding: a prospective randomized controlled trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Trial
- Outcome and risk factors of ulcer healing after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024Article
- Effectiveness and safety of a newly designed self-assembling gel in the treatment of endoscopic submucosal dissection-induced gastric ulcer: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- A Novel Self-Assembled Gel for Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection-Induced Ulcer: A Preclinical Study in a Porcine Model.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a standard procedure for treating gastric neoplasms. However, ESD causes larger artificial ulcers other than mucosal resection methods. We conducted this prospective randomized controlled study to evaluate the effect of stronger acid suppression on ESD ulcers caused by doubling the proton pump inhibitor (PPI) dose and compare the effects of 20-mg (standard dose) and 40-mg (double dose) esomeprazole (EswonampTM, Daewon Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea) on ulcer healing.
methodsOne hundred ninety-seven patients who underwent gastric ESD from July 2017 to December 2017 at Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital were enrolled and randomly assigned to the standard or double-dose group. Change in ulcer size from the day of ESD to 4 weeks after ESD and the scar-change rate were compared between the groups.
resultsThere were no significant differences in ulcer contraction (84.5% in 20 mg group vs 86.3% in 40 mg group, P = .91) or scar-change rate (30.9% vs 30.6%, P > .99) between the groups. In a multivariate analysis, initial ulcer size [odds ratio (OR) 0.24; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.11-0.50] and early gastric cancer (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.08-0.58) were significantly associated with delayed ulcer healing.
conclusionsBoth 40 and 20-mg esomeprazole have similar effects on ESD-induced ulcer area reduction, suggesting that strong acid suppression does not necessarily result in rapid artificial ulcer healing. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: RCT no.: KCT0002885.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.