ArticleMedicine2019
Novel mutations in patients with X-linked Alport syndrome: Two case reports.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleA genotype-phenotype correlation is known to be associated with Alport syndrome (AS). Identifying novel mutations can expand the knowledge about the natural course of AS. PATIENT CONCERNS: The first patient was a-15-year-old boy detected with proteinuria during the school health check-up. The second case was a-29-year-old woman, who visited the outpatient clinic for edema. DIAGNOSIS: We performed targeted next-generation sequencing to identify the mutations associated with AS. Results were confirmed by Sanger sequencing and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Missense mutation (c.2332G>C, p.Gly778Arg) was identified in the first case and an exon 16 deletion was also identified in the second case.
interventionWe treated both cases with angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB). OUTCOMES: The amount of proteinuria in the first case did not change after ARB therapy, during the follow-up period (1 year). Proteinuria in the woman decreased to half of the baseline level, 1 year after treatment. Glomerular filtration rate was also maintained during the follow-up.
conclusionWe identified novel mutations in Koreans with an X-linked AS mutation in the COL4A5 gene and an individual phenotype. This is the first report of AS patients with a novel missense mutation and copy number variation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.