ArticleMedicine2019
Probiotic supplements for relieving stress in healthy participants: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy of probiotics on stress in healthy volunteers: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials.Brain and behavior · 2020Pooled it
- The role of probiotics and prebiotics in modulating of the gut-brain axis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Review
- Impact of Probiotics on Dairy Production Efficiency.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
- Cross-sectional study to assess the healthcare professionals' knowledge, attitude and practices about probiotics use in Pakistan.BMJ open · 2021Article
- The potential role of nutrition in mitigating the psychological impact of COVID-19 in healthcare workers.NFS journal · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPsychological stress is a ubiquitous subjectively negative emotional experience, but excessive psychological stress has adverse effects on the happiness in our lives and physical and mental health, and may cause many health problems. Studies have found that probiotics have a certain role in alleviating negative emotions, reducing abnormal behaviors, improving cognitive function, and also showing the great potential of probiotics in relieving psychological stress. At present, many clinical trials have been carried out to intervene in populations with psychological stress with probiotic supplements, but there still lack of targeted systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, MEDLINE, Psycoinfo, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature will be searched to obtain the eligible randomized controlled trials published up to March 1, 2019. Meanwhile, the references to relevant publications will also be reviewed to identify other studies, and will re-search before finial summary for analysis. EndNote X7 will be used as a document manager for duplicate checking and screening of literature. The risk of bias will be assessed and the date of included studies will be analyzed by Revman V5.3.5.
resultsThe primary outcome will be subjective stress level, general mild psychiatric symptoms of participants. The secondary outcome will be cortisol level and adverse effects likely to be related to treatment.
conclusionThe systematic review and meta-analysis will provide evidence to assess the efficacy and safety of probiotics in relieving psychological stress. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42019122930.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.