Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31095919›Full record

ArticlePreventing chronic disease2019

Secular Trends in Soda Consumption, California, 2011-2016.

Matthew M Lee, Jennifer Falbe, Kristine A Madsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventing chronic disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matthew M LeeUniversity of California, Berkeley, Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Berkeley, California.
Jennifer FalbeUniversity of California, Davis, Human Development and Family Studies, Department of Human Ecology, Davis, California.
Kristine A MadsenUniversity of California, Davis, Human Development and Family Studies, Department of Human Ecology, Davis, California.

Funding

Translational Research Core - Health Engagement & Action Translational (HEAT)P30DK092924 · NIDDK · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Alyce Sophia Adams, HILARY Kessler SELIGMAN · 2011 to 2026
$9.2M
Testing combinations of population interventions to encourage healthy eatingR01DK116852 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SCHILLINGER, DEAN · 2018 to 2022
$3.7M
Reducing sugar-sweetened beverage consumption among young adults: A point-of-selection experimentK01DK113068 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI FALBE, JENNIFER · 2018 to 2022
$814k
NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK113068NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092924NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK116852
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consumption of sugar-sweetened carbonated beverages (including soda) has declined nationally, but trends by state are unknown. We used data from the California Health Interview Survey to assess overall changes in soda consumption among adults aged 18 or older from 2011 through 2016 and identified differences by education and income level. Frequency of soda consumption (times per week) declined from 2011 through 2014 by 16.5% but returned to 2011 levels in 2015 and 2016; trends did not differ by education or income. The proportion of the population that consumed soda did not change among adults with less than a high school diploma or equivalent, but declined significantly among those with at least a high school diploma. Our findings suggest that soda consumption remains a pressing public health problem in California.

Indexed as

Drinking BehaviorAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCaliforniaCarbonated BeveragesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFood PreferencesHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31095919
PMCPMC6549417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.