Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31095895›Full record

ArticleThoracic cancer2019

Efficacy and safety of afatinib in a Chinese population with advanced lung adenocarcinoma with sensitive EGFR mutations.

Shouzheng Wang, Puyuan Xing, Ke Yang, Xuezhi Hao, Di Ma, Yuxin Mu, Junling Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Thoracic cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shouzheng WangDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Puyuan XingDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Ke YangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Hospital of HuanXing, Beijing, China.
Xuezhi HaoDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Di MaDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7051-7393
Yuxin MuDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8465-6933
Junling LiDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7361-325X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfatinib is an irreversible ErbB family blocker that improves progression-free survival (PFS) of advanced EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma compared to chemotherapy. However, afatinib leads to more adverse events than first-generation EGFR inhibitors. Hence, exploration of the optimal afatinib initial dose and its efficacy and safety in Asian patients has drawn extensive attention.

methodsWe retrospectively evaluated demographic and clinical information, survival data, and adverse events in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with afatinib from 27 February 2017 to 30 October 2018.

resultsA total of 60 patients were included in the study. Thirty-nine (65%) patients received afatinib as first-line treatment. The median PFS was 12.3 months (95% confidence internal 7.6-17.0). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that age, gender, smoking history, baseline brain metastasis status, afatinib starting dose, and mutation type did not significantly influence PFS. No significant difference in median PFS between patients treated with an initial dose of afatinib of 40 mg or 30 mg, either in the first-line (14.5 vs. 5.2 months; P = 0.101) or in a second or later-line setting (3.0 vs. 5.0 months; P = 0.375) was observed. The incidence of all grades of rash/acne (92.5% vs. 61.1%; P = 0.011) and paronychia (82.5% vs. 50.0%; P = 0.010) in the 40 mg group was significantly higher than in the 30 mg group.

conclusionFirst-line afatinib treatment is beneficial for advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients with sensitive EGFR mutations. Initial dose and baseline brain metastasis status do not significantly impact PFS.

Indexed as

AdultAfatinibAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungChinaErbB ReceptorsFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMutationProtein Kinase InhibitorsRegression AnalysisRetrospective StudiesAfatinibEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsProtein Kinase InhibitorsAfatinibErbB receptorslung adenocarcinomamolecular targeted therapynon-small-cell lung

Identifiers

PMID31095895
PMCPMC6558598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.