ArticleThoracic cancer2019
Efficacy and safety of afatinib in a Chinese population with advanced lung adenocarcinoma with sensitive EGFR mutations.
Article in Thoracic cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Phase IIIb Open-Label, Single-Arm Study of Afatinib in EGFR TKI-Naïve Patients with EGFRm+ NSCLC: Final Analysis, with a Focus on Patients Enrolled at Sites in China.Targeted oncology · 2022Trial
- Prospective Observational Real-World Study of Afatinib as First-Line Treatment in Patients with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Mutation-Positive Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) in China.Lung Cancer (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Efficacy and Tolerance of First-Line Afatinib in Elderly NSCLC Patients with EGFR Mutations in Vietnam: A Multicenter Real-World Study.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024Article
- A real-world cohort study of first-line afatinib in patients with EGFR-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer in Vietnam.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Management of diarrhea induced by EGFR-TKIs in advanced lung adenocarcinoma.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2023Review
- The Efficacy and Safety of Afatinib in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Brain Metastasis: A Meta-Analysis.Journal of oncology · 2023Article
- Sex dimorphism in response to targeted therapy and immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients: a narrative review.Translational lung cancer research · 2022Review
- Afatinib treatment response in advanced lung adenocarcinomas harboring uncommon mutations.Thoracic cancer · 2021Article
- Afatinib as First-Line Treatment in Asian Patients with EGFR Mutation-Positive NSCLC: A Narrative Review of Real-World Evidence.Advances in therapy · 2021Review
- Impact of Dose Reduction of Afatinib Used in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAfatinib is an irreversible ErbB family blocker that improves progression-free survival (PFS) of advanced EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma compared to chemotherapy. However, afatinib leads to more adverse events than first-generation EGFR inhibitors. Hence, exploration of the optimal afatinib initial dose and its efficacy and safety in Asian patients has drawn extensive attention.
methodsWe retrospectively evaluated demographic and clinical information, survival data, and adverse events in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with afatinib from 27 February 2017 to 30 October 2018.
resultsA total of 60 patients were included in the study. Thirty-nine (65%) patients received afatinib as first-line treatment. The median PFS was 12.3 months (95% confidence internal 7.6-17.0). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that age, gender, smoking history, baseline brain metastasis status, afatinib starting dose, and mutation type did not significantly influence PFS. No significant difference in median PFS between patients treated with an initial dose of afatinib of 40 mg or 30 mg, either in the first-line (14.5 vs. 5.2 months; P = 0.101) or in a second or later-line setting (3.0 vs. 5.0 months; P = 0.375) was observed. The incidence of all grades of rash/acne (92.5% vs. 61.1%; P = 0.011) and paronychia (82.5% vs. 50.0%; P = 0.010) in the 40 mg group was significantly higher than in the 30 mg group.
conclusionFirst-line afatinib treatment is beneficial for advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients with sensitive EGFR mutations. Initial dose and baseline brain metastasis status do not significantly impact PFS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.