Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31095326›Full record

ReviewJournal of the National Cancer Institute2019

Developing a Quality of Cancer Survivorship Care Framework: Implications for Clinical Care, Research, and Policy.

Larissa Nekhlyudov, Michelle A Mollica, Paul B Jacobsen, Deborah K Mayer, Lawrence N Shulman, Ann M Geiger

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 249 papers, 18 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
249citing papers in PubMed, 18 pooled it
14.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06236373 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Unmet Needs of Cancer Survivors in Ausl IRCCS Reggio Emilia Reality: a Qualitative Study and Framework Analysis

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaRan2023 to 2025Enrolled45ConditionsCancer, Breast Cancer, Prostate Cancer, Thyroid CancerArmsFocus Groups or Interviews
NCT07547163 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Patient Voice in the Treatment of Low-grade Gliomas: Use of Patient-reported Outcomes, Vorasidenib and Radiotherapy Compared

TypeobservationalSponsorFondazione I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Neurologico Carlo BestaRan2025 to 2027Enrolled90ConditionsGlioma, Glioma of Brain, Low Grade Glioma of Brain, Low Grade GliomasArmsVorasidenib, Radiotherapy, active surveillance
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

249 citing papers in PubMed, 18 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 380 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Self-management engagement in adults with hematologic cancers: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. A systematic review of smartphone applications for cancer survivors.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2024
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Survivorship care for people affected by advanced or metastatic cancer: MASCC-ASCO standards and practice recommendations.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Electronic Health Interventions for Patients With Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022
    Pooled it
  14. Mapping Systematic Reviews of Breast Cancer Survivorship Interventions: A Network Analysis.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022
    Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Reporting in rodent models of 'chemobrain': a systematic review assessing compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Pooled it
  18. Health information technology to support cancer survivorship care planning: A systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Pooled it
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

189 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Larissa Nekhlyudov
Michelle A Mollica
Paul B Jacobsen
Deborah K Mayer
Lawrence N Shulman
Ann M Geiger
National Cancer Institute · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are now close to 17 million cancer survivors in the United States, and this number is expected to continue to grow. One decade ago the Institute of Medicine report, From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Transition, outlined 10 recommendations aiming to provide coordinated, comprehensive care for cancer survivors. Although there has been noteworthy progress made since the release of the report, gaps remain in research, clinical practice, and policy. Specifically, the recommendation calling for the development of quality measures in cancer survivorship care has yet to be fulfilled. In this commentary, we describe the development of a comprehensive, evidence-based cancer survivorship care quality framework and propose the next steps to systematically apply it in clinical settings, research, and policy.

Indexed as

SurvivorshipTranslational Research, BiomedicalCancer SurvivorsContinuity of Patient CareDelivery of Health CareHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansNeoplasmsPractice Guidelines as TopicQuality of Health Care

Identifiers

PMID31095326
PMCPMC6855988
OpenAlexW2946520226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.