Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31095318›Full record

Trial reportThe Gerontologist2020

Engaging Caregivers in Health-Related Housing Decisions for Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment: A Cluster Randomized Trial.

Rhéda Adekpedjou, Dawn Stacey, Nathalie Brière, Adriana Freitas, Mirjam M Garvelink, Maman Joyce Dogba, Pierre J Durand, Sophie Desroches, Jordie Croteau, Louis-Paul Rivest and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Gerontologist, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rhéda AdekpedjouCentre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne de l'Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
Dawn StaceyOttawa Hospital Research Institute and Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Nathalie BrièreCentre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Québec, Canada.
Adriana FreitasCentre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne de l'Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
Mirjam M GarvelinkCentre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne de l'Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
Maman Joyce DogbaDepartment of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine.
Pierre J DurandDepartment of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine.
Sophie DesrochesSchool of Nutrition, Québec, Canada.
Jordie CroteauCentre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne de l'Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
Louis-Paul RivestDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
France LégaréCentre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne de l'Université Laval, Québec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesInformal caregivers are rarely as involved as they want to be in the housing decisions of cognitively impaired older adults. Lack of awareness of available options and their benefits and risks may lead to decisions that do not reflect older adults' preferences, and to guilt and regret. We assessed the effect of training home care teams in interprofessional shared decision-making (SDM) on the proportion of caregivers who report being active in this decision. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsIn a two-arm pragmatic cluster randomized trial with home care teams working in health centers in the Province of Quebec, we randomized health centers to receive training in interprofessional SDM (intervention) or not (control). Eligible caregivers had made a housing decision for a cognitively impaired adult aged 65 years or older who was receiving services from a home care team. The primary outcome was the proportion of caregivers reporting an active role in decision making. We performed intention-to-treat multilevel analysis.

resultsWe consecutively enrolled a random group of 16 health centers and recruited 309 caregivers, among whom 296 were included in the analysis. In the intervention arm, the proportion of caregivers reporting an active role in decision making increased by 12% (95% CI -2% to 27%; p = .10). After removal of an influential cluster outlier, the proportion increased to 18% (95% CI: 7%-29%; p < .01). DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Training home care teams in interprofessional SDM increased caregiver involvement in health-related housing decisions for cognitively impaired older adults.

Indexed as

Decision MakingHome Care ServicesHousingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCaregiversCognitive DysfunctionEmotionsFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansIndependent LivingMaleMiddle AgedPatient ParticipationHome careInterprofessionalNursing homesPatient engagementShared decision making

Identifiers

PMID31095318
PMCPMC7362613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.