Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31095061›Full record

ArticleMedical care2019

Clinician Experiences and Attitudes Regarding Screening for Social Determinants of Health in a Large Integrated Health System.

Adam Schickedanz, Courtnee Hamity, Artair Rogers, Adam L Sharp, Ana Jackson

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05968716 (Addressing Unmet Social Needs Among Hospitalized Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 121 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
121citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05968716 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Addressing Unmet Social Needs Among Hospitalized Children

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2023 to 2026Enrolled50ConditionsSocial Needs Screening, Caregiver-care Team Relationships, Social Needs Status, Child Health StatusArmsSocial needs screening protocol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

121 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. A Systematic Review of Electronic Community Resource Referral Systems.American journal of preventive medicine · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Assessing Unmet Social Needs in Multiple Sclerosis Care in Australia: A Qualitative Assessment of Feasibility, Barriers and Enablers.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  9. Prevalence and Correlates of Social Risks and Receipt of Resources Among Rural and Urban Veterans.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational

61 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adam SchickedanzDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles.
Courtnee HamityCare Management Institute, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA.
Artair RogersHealth Leads, Boston, MA.
Adam L SharpKaiser Permanente Southern California, Research and Evaluation Department.
Ana JacksonCare Management Institute, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA.

Funding

The Effect of Nanoparticle Encapsulated Resveratrol on Treatment of PeriodontitisKL2TR001882 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Elizabeta Nemeth · 2016 to 2026
$13.1M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001882
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical screening for basic social needs-such as food and housing insecurity-is becoming more common as health systems develop programs to address social determinants of health. Clinician attitudes toward such programs are largely unexplored.

objectiveTo describe the attitudes and experiences of social needs screening among a variety of clinicians and other health care professionals. RESEARCH

designMulticenter electronic and paper-based survey. SUBJECTS: Two hundred fifty-eight clinicians including primarily physicians, social workers, nurses, and pharmacists from a large integrated health system in Southern California. MEASURES: Level of agreement with prompts exploring attitudes toward and barriers to screening and addressing social needs in different clinical settings.

resultsOverall, most health professionals supported social needs screening in clinical settings (84%). Only a minority (41%) of clinicians expressed confidence in their ability to address social needs, and less than a quarter (23%) routinely screen for social needs currently. Clinicians perceived lack of time to ask (60%) and resources (50%) to address social needs as their most significant barriers. We found differences by health profession in attitudes toward and barriers to screening for social needs, with physicians more likely to cite time constraints as a barrier.

conclusionsClinicians largely support social needs programs, but they also recognize key barriers to their implementation. Health systems interested in implementing social needs programs should consider the clinician perspective around the time and resources required for such programs and address these perceived barriers.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelMass ScreeningCaliforniaDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedHealth PersonnelHealth ResourcesHumansSocial Determinants of HealthSurveys and QuestionnairesTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID31095061
PMCPMC6721844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.