Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31095053›Full record

ArticleMedical care2019

Adapting Patient Experience Data Collection Processes for Lower Literacy Patient Populations Using Tablets at the Point of Care.

Lina Tieu, Alicia Hobbs, Urmimala Sarkar, Erin C Nacev, Courtney R Lyles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Effect of use of ambient listening technology on patient-reported communication and satisfaction ratings.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lina TieuDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Jonathan and Karin Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles.
Alicia HobbsCenter for Vulnerable Populations.
Urmimala SarkarCenter for Vulnerable Populations.
Erin C NacevSilver Avenue Family Health Center, San Francisco Health Network, San Francisco.
Courtney R LylesCenter for Vulnerable Populations.

Funding

NRSA Training CoreTL1TR001883 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ALEX BUI, Nina Thawata Harawa · 2016 to 2026
$8.6M
Improving Survivorship Care for Diverse Cancer Patients Cared for in Safety-net SettingsK24CA212294 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SARKAR, URMIMALA · 2017 to 2021
$831k
Engaging Diverse Patients in Using an Online Patient PortalR00HS022408 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LYLES, COURTNEY REES · 2015 to 2017
$740k
AHRQ HHS R00 HS022408NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001883NCI NIH HHS K24 CA212294
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient experience surveys are widely used to capture the patient-reported quality of care and are increasingly being used for formal reporting purposes. There is evidence that certain patient subgroups are less likely to respond to traditional CAHPS surveys. As patient-facing technologies become more common, it is important to examine whether tablet-based patient experience surveys have the potential to promote responses from more diverse populations.

objectivesTo develop, gain perspectives about, and pilot an English and Spanish low-literacy adaptation of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers & Systems Clinician & Group Survey (CG-CAHPS) administered on a tablet device at the point of care. RESEARCH

designCognitive testing and evaluation of a quality improvement pilot comparing a tablet-based adaptation and traditional paper-based versions of the CG-CAHPS survey. SUBJECTS: English-speaking and Spanish-speaking patients receiving primary care in an urban community clinic. MEASURES: To compare the acceptability of low-literacy tablet-based and traditional paper-based patient experience surveys, we examined the concordance of responses between survey modes and preferences for modality, as well as perspectives on usability and reporting care experiences. We examined demographic differences in responses to tablet-based versus mailed surveys from a quality improvement pilot.

resultsThe majority of cognitive interview participants preferred a low-literacy, tablet-based survey over a paper-based survey with traditional wording. In a quality improvement pilot comparing tablet-based administration at the point of care versus mailed surveys, respondents to the tablet-based survey were more likely to be younger and Latino.

conclusionsIf designed with patient input, tablet-based surveys have the potential to improve the collection of patient experience data among diverse populations.

Indexed as

Computers, HandheldData CollectionLiteracyPoint-of-Care SystemsAge FactorsEthnicityFemaleHumansLimited English ProficiencyMaleMiddle AgedQuality ImprovementSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID31095053
PMCPMC6527129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.