ArticleThe Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume2019
International Expert Consensus on a Cell Therapy Communication Tool: DOSES.
Article in The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances and prospects in cell therapy for cancer: explorations from T cells to stem cells.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- Periodontal regenerative therapies with dental stem cells: from pulp-fiction to clinical application.Frontiers of oral and maxillofacial medicine · 2026Article
- Treatment with Autologous Adipose-derived Regenerative Cells for Peyronie's Disease in Men: The Straight @head Pilot Study.European urology open science · 2025Article
- A Proposed Diagnostic and Treatment Algorithm for the Management of Lumbar Discogenic Pain.Journal of pain research · 2025Article
- Forty Years of the Use of Cells for Cartilage Regeneration: The Research Side.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Comparative single-cell transcriptional and proteomic atlas of clinical-grade injectable mesenchymal source tissues.Science advances · 2024Article
- Platelet-rich plasma intra-articular knee injections from open preparation techniques do not pose a higher risk of joint infection: A systematic review of 91 randomized controlled trials and 5914 injections.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2024Review
- Article
- Intrathecal delivery of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells in traumatic spinal cord injury: Phase I trial.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Article
- Bone Healing Gone Wrong: Pathological Fracture Healing and Non-Unions-Overview of Basic and Clinical Aspects and Systematic Review of Risk Factors.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- PRISMA-Compliant Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on Osteoarthritis of Knee Managed with Allogeneic vs Autologous MSCs: Efficacy and Safety Analysis.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2022Review
- The composition of cell-based therapies obtained from point-of-care devices/systems which mechanically dissociate lipoaspirate: a scoping review of the literature.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2022Article
- Mesenchymal Stem Cell Mechanisms of Action and Clinical Effects in Osteoarthritis: A Narrative Review.Genes · 2022Review
- Evaluation of Patient Preference and Perception Regarding the Clinical Use of Autologous Versus Allogeneic Cell Therapy in Orthopedic Surgery.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2022Article
- HIPGEN: a randomized, multicentre phase III study using intramuscular PLacenta-eXpanded stromal cells therapy for recovery following hip fracture arthroplasty : a study design.Bone & joint open · 2022Article
- Clinical Trials Based on Mesenchymal Stromal Cells are Exponentially Increasing: Where are We in Recent Years?Stem cell reviews and reports · 2022Review
- Research trends of mesenchymal stem cells application in orthopedics: A bibliometric analysis of the past 2 decades.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Position Statement: Minimal Criteria for Reporting Veterinary and Animal Medicine Research for Mesenchymal Stromal/Stem Cells in Orthopedic Applications.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022Article
- Cell therapy for cartilage repair.Emerging topics in life sciences · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe lack of a standardized system for describing cell therapies acts as a barrier to advancement in clinical and basic research and practice. The aim of this study was to establish an international expert consensus on strategies to improve standardization and transparency when describing cell therapies. The secondary aim was to develop a consensus among experts on the contents of a standardized tool for describing cell therapies.
methodsThe need for expert consensus on strategies to improve cell therapy communication was confirmed at the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons/National Institutes of Health Optimizing Clinical Use of Biologics Symposium in 2018. A working group of 6 experts convened an international consensus process involving clinicians and basic scientists using validated Delphi methodology. This iterative process was used to define statements on communication of cell therapies and develop a standardized tool for describing cell therapies.
resultsThirty-four experts completed 3 rounds survey with use of the Delphi process. After 3 rounds, 27 statements relating to existing nomenclature, solutions to improve communication, ideal characteristics of a framework, mandatory elements of a new framework, and future work to facilitate application reached consensus with >80% agreement and <5% disagreement. Consensus was reached on the contents of a tool for improving standardization and transparency when describing cell therapies. This tool, dubbed "DOSES," is based on the reporting of 5 core items: donor (i.e., autologous, allogeneic, xenogeneic), origin of tissue, separation from other cell types/preparation method, exhibited cell characteristics associated with behavior, and the site of delivery.
conclusionsThis study has established expert consensus on the communication of cell therapies. The DOSES tool has been developed to improve standardization and transparency in describing cell therapies. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The DOSES tool for describing cell therapies can be utilized by researchers, clinicians, regulators, and industry professionals to improve standardization and transparency when describing cell therapies. The use of this tool may allow clinicians and patients to better understand the characteristics of current and future cell preparations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.