Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31094626›Full record

ArticleJournal of feline medicine and surgery2020

Effect of cat litters on feline coronavirus infection of cell culture and cats.

Diane Addie, Lene Houe, Kirsty Maitland, Giuseppe Passantino, Nicola Decaro

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. How close is SARS-CoV-2 to canine and feline coronaviruses?The Journal of small animal practice · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Diane AddieInstitute of Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7843-2661
Lene HoueReg Acc, Felismir Katteklinik, Hvalso, Denmark.
Kirsty MaitlandInstitute of Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Giuseppe PassantinoDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Nicola DecaroDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6348-7969
University of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesFeline infectious peritonitis (FIP) is caused by infection with feline coronavirus (FCoV). FCoV is incredibly contagious and transmission is via the faecal-oral route. FCoV infection, and therefore FIP, is most common in breeder and rescue catteries, where many cats are kept indoors, using litter trays. Whether it is possible to break the cycle of FCoV infection and reinfection using cat litters has never been investigated. The aim of the study was to examine the effect of cat litters on FCoV infectivity and virus load in multi-cat households, and transmission frequency.

methodsFifteen cat litters were mixed and incubated with FCoV, centrifuged and the supernatants tested in vitro for the ability to prevent virus infection of cell culture. To test applicability of in vitro results to real life, virus load was measured in two households in a double crossover study of four Fuller's earth-based cat litters by testing rectal swabs using FCoV reverse transcriptase quantitative PCR.

resultsFour litters abrogated FCoV infection of cell culture, nine reduced it to a greater or lesser extent and two had no effect. One brand had different virus inhibitory properties depending on where it was manufactured. Fuller's earth-based litters performed best, presumably by adsorbing virus. In the field study, there appeared to be less virus shedding on one Fuller's earth-based cat litter. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The in vitro study successfully identified cat litters that inactivate FCoV; such litters exist so do not need to be developed. Fuller's earth-based litters best prevented infection of cell culture, but did not completely abrogate FCoV transmission in two multi-cat households. A dust-free clumping Fuller's earth litter appeared to fare best, but virus shedding also varied on the control litters, complicating interpretation. Sawdust-based cat litters are not useful in FCoV-endemic households because they track badly and have a poor effect on virus infection.

Indexed as

AnimalsCatsCoronavirus, FelineCross-Over StudiesFecesFeline Infectious PeritonitisImmunologic TestsVirus SheddingBentonitecat litterDr ElseyFCoV infectionFeline coronavirusfeline infectious peritonitisFIPFuller’s earthreducing virus loadvirus inhibition

Identifiers

PMID31094626
PMCPMC8685581
OpenAlexW2945615947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.