Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31094550›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychology2019

A diffusion-model analysis of timing deficits among children with ADHD.

Zvi Shapiro, Cynthia Huang-Pollock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. A diffusion model analysis of task set inertia and task set reconfiguration in ADHD.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Neurophysiology of Perceptual Decision-Making and Its Alterations in Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Search for solutions, learning, simulation, and choice processes in suicidal behavior.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Slow drift rate predicts ADHD symptomology over and above executive dysfunction.Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. A New Spin on Spatial Cognition in ADHD: A Diffusion Model Decomposition of Mental Rotation.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zvi ShapiroDepartment of Psychology.
Cynthia Huang-PollockDepartment of Psychology.

Funding

Social and Academic Problems in ADHD: The Role of Implicit and Explicit LearningR01MH084947 · NIMH · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI HUANG-POLLOCK, CYNTHIA L · 2010 to 2014
$1.8M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH084947
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDeficits in the ability to perceive time have been proposed as an etiologic mechanism in the development of the cognitive and behavioral characteristics associated with ADHD. However, previous studies testing the presence of timing deficits have produced idiosyncratic results. This is in large part due to the underutilization of insights from basic timing research, and from the inherent difficulty that arises when a single index of performance (i.e., reaction time [RT] or accuracy) is used to index the health of what is essentially a multiple-component process. The current article utilizes a diffusion model approach to isolate the component processes involved in timing (i.e., internal clock speed, decision-making speed, speed/accuracy trade-off strategies, and nondecision time) using a well-validated timing task.

methodFifty children with ADHD and 32 non-ADHD controls aged 8-12 completed a temporal bisection procedure.

resultsDiffusion model parameters indicated that both the internal clock and decision-making speeds were slower among children with ADHD. However, the strength of evidence for slowed decision making far outweighed evidence for a slower internal clock.

conclusionsSlower evidence accumulation during decision making is domain-general deficit in ADHD. Such slowing is consistent with adaptive-gain theories, which posit that a suboptimal ratio of neural signal-to-noise is characteristic of children with ADHD. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Decision MakingReaction TimeTime PerceptionAdolescentAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityCase-Control StudiesChildFemaleHumansMaleModels, Theoretical

Identifiers

PMID31094550
PMCPMC6714043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.