Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31094428›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2019

The Impact of the Revised WIC Food Package on Maternal Nutrition During Pregnancy and Postpartum.

Rita Hamad, Akansha Batra, Deborah Karasek, Kaja Z LeWinn, Nicole R Bush, Robert L Davis, Frances A Tylavsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Maternal Outcomes of WIC Recipients Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rita HamadDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Akansha BatraDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Deborah KarasekDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Kaja Z LeWinnDepartment of Psychiatry, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Nicole R BushDepartment of Psychiatry, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Robert L DavisCenter for Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee.
Frances A TylavskyDepartment of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee.

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR002494 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R, WEISDORF, DANIEL J · 2018 to 2022
$34.9M
Assessing the Impact of Educational Interventions on Reducing Disparities in Hypertension and Related BiomarkersK08HL132106 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HAMAD, RITA · 2016 to 2019
$668k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002494NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL132106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) provides nutritional support for pregnant and postpartum women and young children. The typical food package provided to recipient families was revised in October 2009 to include more whole grains, fruits, vegetables, and low-fat milk. Little is known about whether these revisions improved nutrition among women during this critical period of the life course. We conducted a quasiexperimental difference-in-differences analysis, comparing WIC recipients ("treatment" group) before and after the WIC policy change, while accounting for temporal trends among nonrecipients ("control" group). We examined nutritional outcomes among a cohort of 1,454 women recruited during pregnancy in 2006-2011 in Memphis and surrounding Shelby County, Tennessee. We found improvements in several measures of dietary quality and nutrient intake during pregnancy, although these did not persist into the postpartum period. Results were robust to numerous sensitivity analyses. At a time when federal WIC funding is threatened, this study provides some of the first evidence of the benefits of recent WIC revisions among low-income women.

Indexed as

Food AssistanceMaternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaPostpartum PeriodAdultEnergy IntakeFemaleHumansPregnancyPrenatal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaTennesseeUnited Statesdifference-in-differencesmaternal healthnutritionSpecial Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC)

Identifiers

PMID31094428
PMCPMC6670068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.