Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31094360›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2019

DiabetesSistersVoices: Virtual Patient Community to Identify Research Priorities for Women Living With Diabetes.

Peijin Han, Wanda Nicholson, Anna Norton, Karen Graffeo, Richard Singerman, Steven King, Aditi Sundaresan, Wendy Bennett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Peijin HanThe Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4753-9057
Wanda NicholsonCenter for Women's Health Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2645-0328
Anna NortonDiabetesSisters, #180, 1112 W Boughton Road, Bolingbrook, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0472-018X
Karen GraffeoDiabetesSisters, #180, 1112 W Boughton Road, Bolingbrook, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3982-9815
Richard SingermanTrustNetMD, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4586-2440
Steven KingTrustNetMD, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3501-7518
Aditi SundaresanCenter for Women's Health Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2193-7439
Wendy BennettThe Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9828-0706

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen with or at high risk of diabetes have unique health concerns across their life course. Effective methods are needed to engage women living with diabetes to develop and carry out a patient-centered research agenda.

objectiveThis study aimed to (1) describe the creation of DiabetesSistersVoices, a virtual patient community for women living with and at risk for diabetes and (2) assess the feasibility and acceptability of DiabetesSistersVoices for engaging women in talking about their experiences, health care, and research priorities.

methodsWe partnered with a national advocacy organization to create DiabetesSistersVoices and to develop recruitment strategies, which included use of social media, Web-based newsletters, and weblinks through partnering organizations. Study inclusion criteria were as follows: Being a woman aged ≥18 years, residing in the United States, and self-reporting a diagnosis of diabetes or risk of diabetes. Eligible participants were given access to DiabetesSistersVoices and completed online surveys at enrollment and 6 months. We assessed trends in participants' activities, including posting questions, sharing experiences about living with diabetes, and searching for posted resources.

resultsWe enrolled 332 women (white: 86.5%; type 1 diabetes: 76.2%; median age: 51 years [interquartile range: 31 to 59 years]) over 8 months. Most (41.6%, 138/332) were classified as being active users (ie, posting) of the virtual community, 36.1% (120/332) as observers (ie, logged in but no posts), and 22.3% (74/332) as never users (ie, completed baseline surveys but then never logged in). Online activities were constant during the study, although participants had the highest website usage during the first 10 weeks after their enrollment.

conclusionsWe demonstrated the feasibility and acceptability of an online patient community for women living with diabetes by showing durability of recruitment and online usage over 6 months of testing. Next steps are to address barriers to joining a virtual patient community for women of color and women with type 2 diabetes to enhance inclusiveness and gain diverse perspectives to inform diabetes research.

Indexed as

AdultDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansMiddle AgedSocial MediaTelemedicineUnited StatesWomen's Healthdiabetes mellitusonline social networkingsocial mediawomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID31094360
PMCPMC6533875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.