Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31094349›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2019

Methodology Used in Ecological Momentary Assessment Studies About Sedentary Behavior in Children, Adolescents, and Adults: Systematic Review Using the Checklist for Reporting Ecological Momentary Assessment Studies.

Catiana Leila Possamai Romanzini, Marcelo Romanzini, Mariana Biagi Batista, Cynthia Correa Lopes Barbosa, Gabriela Blasquez Shigaki, Genevieve Dunton, Tyler Mason, Enio Ricardo Vaz Ronque

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Objective and subjective measurement of sedentary behavior in human adults: A toolkit.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Catiana Leila Possamai Romanzini *Londrina State University, Department of Physical Education, Londrina, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6677-3290
Marcelo Romanzini *Londrina State University, Department of Physical Education, Londrina, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1355-331X
Mariana Biagi Batista *Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campus of Pantanal, Corumbá, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2513-9354
Cynthia Correa Lopes Barbosa *Federal University of Technology of Paraná, Academic Department of Humanities, Apucarana, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3926-3700
Gabriela Blasquez Shigaki *Rio Preto University Center, Department of Physical Education, São José do Rio Preto, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0241-240X
Genevieve Dunton *University of Southern California, Department of Preventive Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4129-3829
Tyler Mason *University of Southern California, Department of Preventive Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7284-7890
Enio Ricardo Vaz Ronque *Londrina State University, Department of Physical Education, Londrina, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3430-3993

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to measure sedentary behavior (SB) in children, adolescents, and adults can increase the understanding of the role of the context of SB in health outcomes.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to systematically review literature to describe EMA methodology used in studies on SB in youth and adults, verify how many studies adhere to the Methods aspect of the Checklist for Reporting EMA Studies (CREMAS), and detail measures used to assess SB and this associated context.

methodsA systematic literature review was conducted in the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and SPORTDiscus databases, covering the entire period of existence of the databases until January 2018.

resultsThis review presented information about the characteristics and methodology used in 21 articles that utilized EMA to measure SB in youth and adults. There were more studies conducted among youth compared with adults, and studies of youth included more waves and more participants (n=696) than studies with adults (n=97). Most studies (85.7%) adhered to the Methods aspect of the CREMAS. The main criteria used to measure SB in EMA were self-report (81%) with only 19% measuring SB using objective methods (eg, accelerometer). The main equipment to collect objective SB was the ActiGraph, and the cutoff point to define SB was <100 counts/min. Studies most commonly used a 15-min window to compare EMA and accelerometer data.

conclusionsThe majority of studies in this review met minimum CREMAS criteria for studies conducted with EMA. Most studies measured SB with EMA self-report (n=17; 81.0%), and a few studies also used objective methods (n=4; 19%). The standardization of the 15-min window criteria to compare EMA and accelerometer data would lead to a comparison between these and new studies. New studies using EMA with mobile phones should be conducted as they can be considered an attractive method for capturing information about the specific context of SB activities of young people and adults in real time or very close to it.

Indexed as

Sedentary BehaviorAccelerometryAdolescentAdultChecklistEcological Momentary AssessmentFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansMaleResearch DesignSelf ReportYoung Adultaccelerometryhealth behaviorphysical activity

Identifiers

PMID31094349
PMCPMC6540725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.