Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31094217›Full record

ReviewAnnals of medicine2019

Non-invasive cardiac mapping for non-response in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Marc Strik, Sylvain Ploux, Lior Jankelson, Pierre Bordachar

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Marc Strika IHU Liryc , Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute , Bordeaux , France.ORCID 0000-0003-3348-6548
Sylvain Plouxa IHU Liryc , Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute , Bordeaux , France.
Lior Jankelsond Cardiac Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, NYU Langone Health , New York University School of Medicine , NY , USA.
Pierre Bordachara IHU Liryc , Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute , Bordeaux , France.
Université de Bordeaux · FRNew York University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an effective intervention in selected patients with moderate-to-severe heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and abnormal left ventricular activation time. The non-response rate of approximately 30% has remained nearly unchanged since this therapy was introduced 25 years ago. While intracardiac mapping is widely used for diagnosis and guidance of therapy in patients with tachyarrhythmia, its application in characterization of the electrical substrate to elucidate the mechanisms involved in CRT response remain anecdotal. In the present review, we describe the traditional determinants of CRT response before presenting novel non-invasive techniques used for CRT optimization. We discuss efforts to identify the target electrical substrate to guide the deployment of pacing electrodes during the operative procedure. Non-invasive body surface mapping technologies such as ECG imaging or ECG belt enables prediction of acute and chronic CRT response. While electrical dyssynchrony parameters provide high predictive accuracy for CRT response when obtained during intrinsic conduction, their predictive value is less when acquired during CRT or LV-pacing. Key messages Classic predictors of CRT response are female gender, NYHA class ≤ III, left ventricular ejection fraction ≥25%, QRS duration ≥150 ms and estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥60 mL/min. ECG-imaging is a comprehensive non-invasive mapping system which allows to express the amount of electrical asynchrony of a CRT candidate. Non-invasive body surface mapping technologies enables excellent prediction of acute and chronic CRT response before implantation. When performed during CRT or LV-pacing, the added value of these mapping systems remains unclear.

Indexed as

Body Surface Potential MappingBundle-Branch BlockCardiac Resynchronization TherapyElectrocardiographyFemaleHeart FailureHumansMalePredictive Value of TestsStroke VolumeVentricular Dysfunction, LeftVentricular Function, LeftbeltCRTECGiMapping

Identifiers

PMID31094217
PMCPMC7857455
OpenAlexW2945592737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.