ReviewAnnals of medicine2019
Non-invasive cardiac mapping for non-response in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Review in Annals of medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review of computational techniques, dataset utilization, and feature extraction in electrocardiographic imaging.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2025Pooled it
- Real-time assessment of inter and intraventricular synchrony in cardiac resynchronization therapy with left bundle branch pacing using ECGi and low-frequency QRS analysis.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026Article
- Ultra-High-Frequency ECG in Cardiac Pacing and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: From Technical Concept to Clinical Application.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Review
- Current Role of Electrocardiographic Imaging in Patient Selection for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Review
- Noninvasive Electrical Mapping Compared with the Paced QRS Complex for Optimizing CRT Programmed Settings and Predicting Multidimensional Response.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2023Article
- The role of electrocardiographic imaging in patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2021Article
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy with intraoperative epicardial mapping via minithoracotomy: 10 years' experience.Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE · 2021Article
- Electrocardiographic imaging of His bundle, left bundle branch, epicardial, and endocardial left ventricular pacing to achieve cardiac resynchronization therapy.HeartRhythm case reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an effective intervention in selected patients with moderate-to-severe heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and abnormal left ventricular activation time. The non-response rate of approximately 30% has remained nearly unchanged since this therapy was introduced 25 years ago. While intracardiac mapping is widely used for diagnosis and guidance of therapy in patients with tachyarrhythmia, its application in characterization of the electrical substrate to elucidate the mechanisms involved in CRT response remain anecdotal. In the present review, we describe the traditional determinants of CRT response before presenting novel non-invasive techniques used for CRT optimization. We discuss efforts to identify the target electrical substrate to guide the deployment of pacing electrodes during the operative procedure. Non-invasive body surface mapping technologies such as ECG imaging or ECG belt enables prediction of acute and chronic CRT response. While electrical dyssynchrony parameters provide high predictive accuracy for CRT response when obtained during intrinsic conduction, their predictive value is less when acquired during CRT or LV-pacing. Key messages Classic predictors of CRT response are female gender, NYHA class ≤ III, left ventricular ejection fraction ≥25%, QRS duration ≥150 ms and estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥60 mL/min. ECG-imaging is a comprehensive non-invasive mapping system which allows to express the amount of electrical asynchrony of a CRT candidate. Non-invasive body surface mapping technologies enables excellent prediction of acute and chronic CRT response before implantation. When performed during CRT or LV-pacing, the added value of these mapping systems remains unclear.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.