Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31093940›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2019

Creating an Interprofessional guideline to support patients receiving oral anticoagulation therapy: a Delphi exercise.

Nikki L Damen, Bart J F Van den Bemt, Kurt E Hersberger, John Papastergiou, Filipa Alves da Costa, Silas Rydant, Naomi S Wartenberg, Trudy Lobban, Isabelle Arnet, Sotiris Antoniou and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Nikki L DamenNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Bart J F Van den BemtSint Maartenskliniek Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. b.vandenbemt@maartenskliniek.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8560-9514
Kurt E HersbergerUniversity of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
John PapastergiouUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Filipa Alves da CostaCentro de Investigação Interdisciplinar Egas Moniz (CiiEM), Instituto Universitário Egas Moniz, Caparica, Portugal.
Silas RydantRoyal Pharmacist Association of Antwerp (KAVA), Antwerp, Belgium.
Naomi S WartenbergSint Maartenskliniek Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Trudy LobbanUCLPartners, London, UK.
Isabelle ArnetUniversity of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Sotiris AntoniouBarts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
International Pharmacists for Anticoagulation Care Taskforce (iPACT)
University of Basel · CHNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research · NLSint Maartenskliniek · NLBarts Health NHS Trust · GBEscola Superior de Saúde Egas Moniz · PTRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Oral anticoagulation therapy has proven beneficial impact on the prevention of thromboembolic events. However, the use of antocoagulatns also increases the risk of bleeds. To maximize the benefits and minimize the risks of the treatment, guidance on appropriate use of oral anticoagulants is essential. An international guideline describing relevant components and requirements for pharmaceutical care for patients receiving a therapy woth oral antocoagulants would increase the quality of care. However, recommendations on pharmaceutical care for patients on anticoagulation is lacking. Objective This study aims to develop an interprofessional guideline to support patients in their use of oral anticoagulation therapy. Method Two systematic literature searches were performed on existing guidelines on the management and interventions to improve-oral anticoagulant use, to generate possible recommendations. Subsequently, an international expert panel with 26 pharmacists with extensive experience in clinical and/or scientific work on anticoagulation from a total of 22 European and 4 non-European countries was constituted. With this (geographically well distributed) expert panel, a four-round internet-based Delphi technique was conducted to reach consensus on their relevance. Items were ranked on a 1-10 scale of agreement. A median agreement score of ≥ 7.5 was considered the threshold for consensus. Levels of importance were rated on a 1-3 scale. Setting A global network of 26 pharmacists specialized in oral antocoagulation therapy. Main outcome measure Development of inter-professional guideline. Results After the four Delphi rounds 18 guideline recommendations were formulated. Consensus of opinion was achieved for all recommendations (median agreement: 8.5-10.0), whereas mean levels of importance were between 1.1 and 2.0 (SD: 0.2-0.7). The following domains were rated as most important targets for improving the care around oral anticoagulation: 'INR-monitoring', 'Transfer of care between health care settings', 'Adherence to medication', 'Patient communication and engagement', and 'Medication reconciliation and medication review'. Conclusion The 18 recommendations included in this guideline provide the base for optimization of anticoagulation care across different countries/healthcare systems. Future work involves translating the guideline recommendations into clinical practice. Once implemented, the recommendations of the guideline will support health care providers with the pharmaceutical care for patients on, oral anticoagulation which will improve the effective and safe use of these medicines.

Indexed as

Delphi TechniqueAdministration, OralAnticoagulantsConsensusGuidelines as TopicHumansInternationalityPharmaceutical ServicesAnticoagulantsGuideline developmentInterprofessional guidelineOral anticoagulationsPharmaceutical care

Identifiers

PMID31093940
PMCPMC6677675
OpenAlexW2945696186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.