Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31093898›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2020

Safety, Efficacy, and Technical Details of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography After Irreversible Electroporation for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.

Neal Bhutiani, Vladimir Davidyuk, Garrett F Mortensen, Amber N Brown, Michael H Bahr, Robert C G Martin, Gary C Vitale

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Neal BhutianiUniversity of Louisville Department of Surgery, 550 S. Jackson Street, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA.
Vladimir DavidyukUniversity of Louisville Department of Surgery, 550 S. Jackson Street, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA.
Garrett F MortensenUniversity of Louisville Department of Surgery, 550 S. Jackson Street, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA.
Amber N BrownUniversity of Louisville Department of Surgery, 550 S. Jackson Street, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA.
Michael H BahrUniversity of Louisville Department of Surgery, 550 S. Jackson Street, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA.
Robert C G MartinUniversity of Louisville Department of Surgery, 550 S. Jackson Street, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5537-3387
Gary C VitaleUniversity of Louisville Department of Surgery, 550 S. Jackson Street, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA. garyvitale@gmail.com.
University of Louisville · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients undergoing irreversible electroporation (IRE) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) may experience biliary obstruction owing to inflammation generated by tumor ablation. This study assessed the safety, efficacy, and technical details of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for biliary decompression after IRE.

methodsA single-institution database of patients undergoing IRE for LAPC between 2012 and 2017 was queried for patients requiring post-IRE ERCP. Patients were evaluated along demographic, laboratory, procedural, and outcome measures.

resultsOf 113 patients with LAPC who underwent IRE, 6 (5.3%) required subsequent ERCP for biliary obstruction. A total of 12 ERCPs were performed. Two patients (33%) had duodenal bulb narrowing requiring dilation, and one patient (17%) had a pancreatic head cyst complicating guidewire passage. Biliary cannulation was achieved in all patients in a median time of 30 min. Four patients (67%) underwent sphincterotomy, and 5 (83%) underwent stent placement. Post-procedurally, all showed liver test improvement. None developed pancreatitis. Four patients underwent a 2nd ERCP. All were successful and included stent placement.

conclusionsFor patients with biliary obstruction after IRE, ERCP with sphincterotomy and stent placement can safely relieve this obstruction. Duodenal dilation and careful guidewire manipulation may be required to maximize technical success in these patients.

Indexed as

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradePancreatic NeoplasmsElectroporationHumansPancreatic DuctsSphincterotomy, EndoscopicTreatment OutcomeEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyIrreversible electroporationPancreatic adenocarcinoma

Identifiers

PMID31093898
OpenAlexW2945811758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.