Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31093863›Full record

ArticleBrain topography2019

Localization of Sensorimotor Cortex Using Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Magnetoencephalography.

Minna Pitkänen, Shogo Yazawa, Katja Airaksinen, Pantelis Lioumis, Jussi Nurminen, Eero Pekkonen, Jyrki P Mäkelä

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain topography, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Minna PitkänenDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland. minna.pitk@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1716-3909
Shogo YazawaDepartment of Systems Neuroscience, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan.
Katja AiraksinenBioMag Laboratory, HUS Medical Imaging Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Pantelis LioumisDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland.
Jussi NurminenBioMag Laboratory, HUS Medical Imaging Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Eero PekkonenDepartment of Neurology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Jyrki P MäkeläBioMag Laboratory, HUS Medical Imaging Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mapping of the sensorimotor cortex gives information about the cortical motor and sensory functions. Typical mapping methods are navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and magnetoencephalography (MEG). The differences between these mapping methods are, however, not fully known. TMS center of gravities (CoGs), MEG somatosensory evoked fields (SEFs), corticomuscular coherence (CMC), and corticokinematic coherence (CKC) were mapped in ten healthy adults. TMS mapping was performed for first dorsal interosseous (FDI) and extensor carpi radialis (ECR) muscles. SEFs were induced by tactile stimulation of the index finger. CMC and CKC were determined as the coherence between MEG signals and the electromyography or accelerometer signals, respectively, during voluntary muscle activity. CMC was mapped during the activation of FDI and ECR muscles separately, whereas CKC was measured during the waving of the index finger at a rate of 3-4 Hz. The maximum CMC was found at beta frequency range, whereas maximum CKC was found at the movement frequency. The mean Euclidean distances between different localizations were within 20 mm. The smallest distance was found between TMS FDI and TMS ECR CoGs and longest between CMC FDI and CMC ECR sites. TMS-inferred localizations (CoGs) were less variable across participants than MEG-inferred localizations (CMC, CKC). On average, SEF locations were 8 mm lateral to the TMS CoGs (p < 0.01). No differences between hemispheres were found. Based on the results, TMS appears to be more viable than MEG in locating motor cortical areas.

Indexed as

MagnetoencephalographyTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdultBrain MappingElectromyographyFemaleFingersHumansMaleMotor CortexMovementMuscle, SkeletalSensorimotor CortexTouchYoung AdultCorticokinematic coherenceCorticomuscular coherenceMagnetoencephalographyMotor evoked potentialNavigated transcranial magnetic stimulationSomatosensory evoked field

Identifiers

PMID31093863
PMCPMC6707977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.