ReviewCurrent oncology reports2019
How Do We Follow Up Patients With Endometrial Cancer?
Review in Current oncology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patients' preferences for follow-up after endometrial cancer surgery.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2026Article
- Patient Voices: What Can We Learn From the Covid-19 Pandemic About Follow-Up Care in Gynaecologic Oncology?Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Living with and beyond gynecologic cancer: A summary of current trends and perspectives.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2025Article
- Cancer worry is associated with increased use of supportive health care-results from the multinational InCHARGE study.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2024Article
- Patient-Initiated Follow-Up in Ovarian Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Article
- Article
- Tumor abnormal protein as a promising biomarker for screening solid malignancies and monitoring recurrence and metastasis.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- The long game: Telemedicine patient satisfaction metrics and methods of recurrence detection for gynecologic cancer patients throughout the initial year of the COVID-19 pandemic.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2022Article
- Mortality risk and physical activity across the lifespan in endometrial cancer survivors.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewIn this review, we present the existing evidence regarding follow-up care after endometrial cancer, including content of follow-up and type of provider. We furthermore discuss the future perspectives for follow-up care and research in the field. RECENT
findingsRecently published randomized controlled trials show that nurse-led telephone follow-up and patient-initiated follow-up are feasible alternatives to routine hospital-based follow-up. No randomized or prospective study has evaluated the effect of routine follow-up on survival. Hence, current knowledge is derived from retrospective studies with the inherent risk of bias. The most important method for recurrence detection is a review of symptoms. There is no evidence to support a survival benefit from the use of routine physical examinations, additional tests, or imaging. One in three of the women attending hospital-based follow-up experience unmet needs, and alternative models for follow-up focused on survivorship care and empowerment should be tested.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31093835What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.