Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31093726›Full record

ArticleMicrobial ecology2020

Amphibian Host and Skin Microbiota Response to a Common Agricultural Antimicrobial and Internal Parasite.

Obed Hernández-Gómez, Vanessa Wuerthner, Jessica Hua

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial ecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A toxic environment selects for specialist microbiome in poison frogs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Characterization of the Skin Cultivable Microbiota Composition of the FrogInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Obed Hernández-GómezDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA. obedhg@berkeley.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1226-1534
Vanessa WuerthnerBiological Sciences Department, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY, 13902, USA.
Jessica HuaBiological Sciences Department, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY, 13902, USA.
Binghamton University · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

Directorate for Biological Sciences 1708926Division of Environmental Biology 1655190
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Holistic approaches that simultaneously characterize responses of both microbial symbionts and their hosts to environmental shifts are imperative to understanding the role of microbiotas on host health. Using the northern leopard frog (Lithobates pipiens) as our model, we investigated the effects of a common trematode (family Echinostomatidae), a common agricultural antimicrobial (Sulfadimethoxine; SDM), and their interaction on amphibian skin microbiota and amphibian health (growth metrics and susceptibility to parasites). In the trematode-exposed individuals, we noted an increase in alpha diversity and a shift in microbial communities. In the SDM-treated individuals, we found a change in the composition of the skin microbiota similar to those induced by the trematode treatment. Groups treated with SDM, echinostomes, or a combination of SDM and echinostomes, had higher relative abundances of OTUs assigned to Flavobacterium and Acinetobacter. Both of these genera have been associated with infectious disease in amphibians and the production of anti-pathogen metabolites. Similar changes in microbial community composition between SDM and trematode exposed individuals may have resulted from stress-related disruption of host immunity. Despite changes in the microbiota, we found no effect of echinostomes and SDM on host health. Given the current disease- and pollution-related threats facing amphibians, our study highlights the need to continue to evaluate the influence of natural and anthropogenic stressors on host-associated microbial communities.

Indexed as

AmphibiansAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaMicrobiotaPhylogenySkinTrematodaAnti-Bacterial Agents16S rRNAEchinostomesLithobates pipiensSulfadimethoxine

Identifiers

PMID31093726
OpenAlexW2945358445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.