Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31093715›Full record

ReviewInternational orthopaedics2019

High-energy tibial pilon fractures: an instructional review.

Boris A Zelle, Khang H Dang, Samuel S Ornell

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International orthopaedics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Surgical wound complications in ankle ORIF patients: a predictive analysis on a single-center retrospective cohort of 287 patients.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Swollen Ankle Fractures: What Predicts Delays in Definitive Fixation?Journal of clinical practice and research · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Symmetry of the left and right tibial plafond; a comparison of 75 distal tibia pairs.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Boris A ZelleDepartment of Orthopaedics, UT Health San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, MC-7774, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA. zelle@uthscsa.edu.
Khang H DangDepartment of Orthopaedics, UT Health San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, MC-7774, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
Samuel S OrnellDepartment of Orthopaedics, UT Health San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, MC-7774, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-energy tibial pilon fractures continue to represent a significant challenge to the treating orthopaedic surgeon. Pre-operative evaluation includes a careful clinical assessment of the associated soft tissue injury, which frequently dictates surgical management. Staged surgical reconstruction remains the standard treatment protocol at most trauma centres. This includes application of a temporary spanning external fixator for approximately one to four weeks, followed by open reduction and internal fixation once the surrounding soft tissues are amendable. Despite careful soft tissue management protocols, the risk of wound complications continues to be relatively high compared to other orthopaedic trauma procedures. The functional long-term outcomes of these injuries remain limited, and recent data has emphasised that the majority of patients do not regain their pre-operative work status. In addition, the health-related quality of life scores fare poorly when compared to other orthopaedic and non-orthopaedic patient populations, and many patients develop post-traumatic arthritis within the tibiotalar joint. It has been shown that the quality of fracture reduction may significantly correlate with the long-term functional outcomes. While the orthopaedic community has come a long way with regard to safe management of high-energy tibial pilon fractures, the clinical outcomes continue to remain limited. In particular, the persistently high rates of wound complications and the limited functional long-term outcomes leave significant room for improvement. Future investigators may focus on further innovations to minimise the risk of wound complications. The surgical team may emphasise the quality of fracture reduction as an important treatment goal.

Indexed as

Fracture FixationFractures, OpenHumansRange of Motion, ArticularSoft Tissue InjuriesTibial FracturesDistal tibiaFracturePilonPlafondSoft tissue injury

Identifiers

PMID31093715
OpenAlexW2945142431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.