Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31093665›Full record

ArticleToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2019

Enhanced Quality Metrics for Assessing RNA Derived From Archival Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Tissue Samples.

Leah C Wehmas, Charles E Wood, Brian N Chorley, Carole L Yauk, Gail M Nelson, Susan D Hester

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. FFPE-CUTAC: A Single Assay, Multiple Layers.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Assessing the Effects of a 3-Dimensional (3D) Pathology Tissue-Processing Workflow on Downstream Molecular Analyses.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Effect of formalin-fixation and paraffin-embedded tissue storage times on RNAscope in situ hybridization signal amplification.Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A Novel HPLC-Based Method to Investigate on RNA after Fixation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Leah C WehmasNational Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709.
Charles E WoodNational Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709.
Brian N ChorleyNational Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709.
Carole L YaukEnvironmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Health Canada, Ottawa K1A 0K9, Canada.
Gail M NelsonNational Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709.
Susan D HesterNational Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709.
Environmental Protection Agency · USHealth Canada · CA

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues provide an important resource for toxicogenomic research. However, variability in the integrity or quality of RNA obtained from archival FFPE specimens can lead to unreliable data and wasted resources, and standard protocols for measuring RNA integrity do not adequately assess the suitability of FFPE RNA. The main goal of this study was to identify improved methods for evaluating FFPE RNA quality for whole-genome sequencing. We examined RNA quality metrics conducted prior to RNA-sequencing in paired frozen and FFPE samples with varying levels of quality based on age in block and time in formalin. RNA quality was measured by the RNA integrity number (RIN), a modified RIN called the paraffin-embedded RNA metric, the percentage of RNA fragments >100-300 nucleotides in size (DV100-300), and 2 quantitative PCR-based methods. This information was correlated to sequencing read quality, mapping, and gene detection. Among fragmentation-based methods, DV and PCR-based metrics were more informative than RIN or paraffin-embedded RNA metric in determining sequencing success. Across low- and high-quality FFPE samples, a minimum of 80% of RNA fragments >100 nucleotides (DV100 > 80) provided the best indication of gene diversity and read counts upon sequencing. The PCR-based methods further showed quantitative reductions in amplifiable RNA of target genes related to sample age and time in formalin that inform input quantity of FFPE RNA for sequencing. These results should aid in screening and prioritizing archival FFPE samples for retrospective analyses of gene expression.

Indexed as

HumansParaffin EmbeddingRNASequence Analysis, RNATissue FixationWhole Genome SequencingRNAbiorepositoriesDVFFPEPCRRNA integrityRNA-sequencingtranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID31093665
PMCPMC7029400
OpenAlexW2944906328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.