Trial reportEuropean heart journal2019
Cardiovascular biomarkers in patients with acute decompensated heart failure randomized to sacubitril-valsartan or enalapril in the PIONEER-HF trial.
Trial report in European heart journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02554890 (A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Double Dummy, Parallel Group, Active-controlled 8-week Study to Evaluate the Effect of Sacubitril/Valsartan), which is not on this map. Cited by 40 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Double Dummy, Parallel Group, Active-controlled 8-week Study to Evaluate the Effect of Sacubitril/Valsartan (LCZ696) Versus Enalapril on Changes in NT-proBNP and Safety and Tolerability of In-hospital Initiation of LCZ696 Compared to Enalapril in HFrEF Patients Who Have Been Stabilized Following Hospitalization for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (ADHF).
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.
- Short-term renal and cardiac outcomes of combined ARNI and SGLT2 therapy in AHF patients: a prospective single-arm interventional study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Trial
- Cardiovascular biomarkers in patients with acute decompensated heart failure randomized to sacubitril-valsartan or enalapril in the PIONEER-HF trial.European heart journal · 2019Trial
- The Clinical Value of NT-proBNP, sST2, and Galectin-3 in the Management of Heart Failure: From Diagnosis to Dynamic Monitoring: A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Review
- Article
- The spectrum of congestion in heart failure: underlying pathophysiology and diagnostic strategies.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- Early initiation of sacubitril/valsartan in STEMI patients improves ventricular remodeling.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Inflammation in heart failure: pathophysiology and therapeutic strategies.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2024Review
- Examining the Long-Term Prognostic Significance of Serum sST2: Influence of Myocardial Infarction History and Subgroup Level Standardization.Journal of inflammation research · 2024Article
- Prognostic Value of sST2 in Heart Failure.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Falling corin and ANP activity levels accelerate development of heart failure and cardiac fibrosis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- The history and mystery of sacubitril/valsartan: From clinical trial to the real world.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Liver tests and outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: findings from DAPA-HF.European journal of heart failure · 2022Article
- Association of High-Sensitivity Troponin T and I Blood Concentrations With All-Cause Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcome in Stable Patients-Results From the INTERCATH Cohort.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Observational
- Cyclic GMP modulating drugs in cardiovascular diseases: mechanism-based network pharmacology.Cardiovascular research · 2022Review
- Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibition in patients with acute decompensated heart failure: an expert consensus position paper.Heart failure reviews · 2022Review
- Assessing clinical and biomarker characteristics to optimize the benefits of sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Natriuretic Peptide-guided Therapy for Heart Failure.Heart international · 2022Review
- Molecular mechanisms of sacubitril/valsartan in cardiac remodeling.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
- Rationale and design of a multi-center, prospective randomized controlled trial on the effects of sacubitril-valsartan versus enalapril on left ventricular remodeling in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: The PERI-STEMI study.Clinical cardiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsCirculating high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hsTn) and soluble ST2 (sST2) reflect myocardial stress in patients with heart failure (HF). Production of cyclic guanosine 3'5' monophosphate (cGMP) in response to activation of natriuretic peptide receptors reduces cardiac afterload and preload. We assessed the effects of sacubitril/valsartan on these biomarkers in patients with reduced ejection fraction and acute decompensated HF (ADHF). METHODS AND
resultsPIONEER-HF was a randomized, double-blind trial of sacubitril/valsartan vs. enalapril in hospitalized patients with ADHF following haemodynamic stabilization. We measured circulating hsTnT, sST2, and urinary cGMP at baseline, 1, 2 (sST2, cGMP), 4, and 8 weeks (n = 694 with all baseline biomarkers). Ratios of geometric means (timepoint/baseline) were determined and compared as a ratio for sacubitril/valsartan vs. enalapril. Compared with enalapril, sacubitril/valsartan led to a significantly greater decline in hsTnT and sST2. This effect emerged as early as 1 week for sST2 and was significant for both at 4 weeks with a 16% greater reduction in hsTnT (P < 0.001) and 9% greater reduction in sST2 (P = 0.0033). Serial urinary cGMP increased with sacubitril/valsartan compared with enalapril (P < 0.001, 1 week). The significant differences between treatment groups for each biomarker were sustained at 8 weeks. In an exploratory multivariable-adjusted analysis of cardiovascular death or HF-rehospitalization, the concentrations of hsTnT, sST2 at week 1 were significantly associated with subsequent outcome.
conclusionBiomarkers of myocardial stress are elevated in patients with ADHF and associated with outcome. Compared with enalapril, sacubitril/valsartan reduces myocardial injury and haemodynamic stress as reflected by biomarkers, with an onset that is apparent within 1-4 weeks. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02554890 clinical.trials.gov.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.