Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31093580›Full record

ArticleCommunications physics2018

Confocal laser scanning microscopy for rapid optical characterization of graphene.

Vishal Panchal, Yanfei Yang, Guangjun Cheng, Jiuning Hu, Mattias Kruskopf, Chieh-I Liu, Albert F Rigosi, Christos Melios, Angela R Hight Walker, David B Newell and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications physics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Development of gateless quantum Hall checkerboardJournal of physics D: Applied physics · 2020
    Article
  13. Metrological Suitability of Functionalized Epitaxial Graphene.IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Analysing quantized resistance behaviour in graphene CorbinoJournal of physics D: Applied physics · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Vishal PanchalNational Physical Laboratory, Hampton Road, Teddington TW11 0LW, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3954-8535
Yanfei YangNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.
Guangjun ChengNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.
Jiuning HuNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.
Mattias KruskopfNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.
Chieh-I LiuNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.
Albert F RigosiNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.
Christos MeliosNational Physical Laboratory, Hampton Road, Teddington TW11 0LW, UK.
Angela R Hight WalkerNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.
David B NewellNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.
Olga KazakovaNational Physical Laboratory, Hampton Road, Teddington TW11 0LW, UK.
Randolph E ElmquistNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.

Funding

Intramural NIST DOC 9999-NIST
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two-dimensional (2D) materials such as graphene have become the focus of extensive research efforts in condensed matter physics. They provide opportunities for both fundamental research and applications across a wide range of industries. Ideally, characterization of graphene requires non-invasive techniques with single-atomic-layer thickness resolution and nanometer lateral resolution. Moreover, commercial application of graphene requires fast and large-area scanning capability. We demonstrate the optimized balance of image resolution and acquisition time of non-invasive confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), rendering it an indispensable tool for rapid analysis of mass-produced graphene. It is powerful for analysis of 1-5 layers of exfoliated graphene on Si/SiO

Identifiers

PMID31093580
PMCPMC6512973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.