Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31093564›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic and prognostic research2018

Cost implications for the NHS of using the Alere™ i Influenza A & B near patient test with nasal swabs.

A J Allen, R A O'Leary, S Davis, S Graziadio, W S Jones, A J Simpson, D A Price, L Vale, M Power

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic and prognostic research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

A J AllenNIHR Newcastle In Vitro Diagnostics Co-operative, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3222-0396
R A O'LearyNIHR Newcastle In Vitro Diagnostics Co-operative, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
S Davis4Department of Virology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
S GraziadioNIHR Newcastle In Vitro Diagnostics Co-operative, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
W S JonesNIHR Newcastle In Vitro Diagnostics Co-operative, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
A J SimpsonNIHR Newcastle In Vitro Diagnostics Co-operative, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
D A PriceNIHR Newcastle In Vitro Diagnostics Co-operative, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
L ValeNIHR Newcastle In Vitro Diagnostics Co-operative, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
M PowerNIHR Newcastle In Vitro Diagnostics Co-operative, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
NIHR Leeds In Vitro Diagnostics Co-operative · GBNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBRoyal Victoria Infirmary · GBSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfluenza is an acute viral infection of the respiratory tract. A rapid confirmatory diagnosis of influenza is important, since it is highly transmissible and outbreaks of influenza within the hospital setting increase morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost implications, from the perspective of the UK NHS, of using on-label nasal swabs with the Alere™ i Influenza A & B test in a near patient setting.

methodsA cost consequence model was developed. The time horizon of the model was from hospital admission on suspicion of influenza until the end of treatment (following a diagnosis of influenza or discharge from hospital). Data on the prevalence of influenza and the sensitivity and specificity of the Alere™ i Influenza A & B test came from two prospective observational diagnostic accuracy studies. Costs were obtained from published resources. Uncertainties in the model data were investigated using deterministic, one-way sensitivity analyses.

resultsUsing the Alere™ i Influenza A & B point of care test with nasal swabs (on label) in NHS medical assessment units and emergency departments could save approximately £242,730 per 1000 adults presenting with influenza-like symptoms. The main cause for this was reduced times to availability of the result compared with the laboratory RT-PCR test. Other key drivers of savings were the cost of isolation, the prevalence of influenza, the specificity of the test, and the availability of isolation resources.

conclusionsThe Alere™ i Influenza A & B point of care test would have greatest impact in hospitals that have extensive delays in the time to receive a result. Sensitivity analyses identified the model parameters which would have greatest effect on the result and confirmed that assumptions were conservative, i.e. did not change key results.

Indexed as

Alere™ i Influenza A & B testCost analysisCost consequencesCost minimisationFluInfection controlInfluenzaNear-patient testingPoint-of-care testing

Identifiers

PMID31093564
PMCPMC6460782
OpenAlexW2883221867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.