Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31093514›Full record

ArticleNeurophotonics2019

Quantitative

Markus Aswendt, Stefanie Vogel, Cordula Schäfer, Amit Jathoul, Martin Pule, Mathias Hoehn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurophotonics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Role of Optical Imaging in Translational Nanomedicine.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. How to Select Firefly Luciferin Analogues for In Vivo Imaging.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Non-invasive Reporter Gene Imaging of Cell Therapies, including T Cells and Stem Cells.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2020
    Review
  18. How Non-invasiveFrontiers in physiology · 2020
    Review
  19. Neural regeneration research · 2020
    Article
  20. IndividualFrontiers in immunology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Markus AswendtMax Planck Institute for Metabolism Research, In-vivo-NMR Laboratory, Cologne, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1423-0934
Stefanie VogelMax Planck Institute for Metabolism Research, In-vivo-NMR Laboratory, Cologne, Germany.
Cordula SchäferMax Planck Institute for Metabolism Research, In-vivo-NMR Laboratory, Cologne, Germany.
Amit JathoulCardiff School of Biosciences, Molecular Biosciences, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Martin PuleUniversity College London, Cancer Institute, Department of Haematology, London, United Kingdom.
Mathias HoehnMax Planck Institute for Metabolism Research, In-vivo-NMR Laboratory, Cologne, Germany.
Max Planck Institute for Metabolism Research · DELondon Cancer · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioluminescence imaging (BLI) is an optical imaging method that can be translated from the cell culture dish

Indexed as

bioluminescenceimplantationluciferaseoptical imagingspectral unmixingstem cells

Identifiers

PMID31093514
PMCPMC6504011
OpenAlexW2940773142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.