Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31093483›Full record

ArticleAdvanced electronic materials2018

Paper in Electronic and Optoelectronic Devices.

Dongheon Ha, Nikolai B Zhitenev, Zhiqiang Fang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced electronic materials, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Nanoscale Characterization of Photocurrent and Photovoltage in Polycrystalline Solar Cells.The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. A New Class of Electronic Devices Based on Flexible Porous Substrates.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Improving dielectric nanoresonator array coatings for solar cells.Particle & particle systems characterization : measurement and description of particle properties and behavior in powders and other disperse systems · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dongheon HaCenter for Nanoscale Science and Technology, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, 20899, USA.
Nikolai B ZhitenevCenter for Nanoscale Science and Technology, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, 20899, USA.
Zhiqiang FangState Key Laboratory of Pulp and Paper Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510640, China.

Funding

Intramural NIST DOC 9999-NIST
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paper, one of the oldest materials for storage and exchange of human's information, has been reinvented as a building component of electronic and optoelectronic devices over the past decades with successful demonstration of paper-based or paper-using devices. These recent achievements can meet the demand for lightweight, cost-effective, and/or flexible electronic and optoelectronic devices with advanced functionality and reduced manufacturing costs. This article provides a review of electronic and optoelectronic devices relying on or making use of the unique properties achievable with paper-based materials. Basic scientific/technical principles, quantitative comparisons of material, electronic and/or optical properties, and benefits for each paper-based application are given. Application-specific research challenges, future design considerations, and development directions are also discussed.

Indexed as

celluloseelectronicsflexibleoptoelectronicspaper

Identifiers

PMID31093483
PMCPMC6512869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.