ArticleFood science and biotechnology2019
Proteomic response of
Article in Food science and biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Encapsulation of Saccharomyces spp. for Use as Probiotic in Food and Feed: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2024Pooled it
- Multi-omics characterization of Saccharomyces boulardii in the biocontrol of Aspergillus flavus.Archives of microbiology · 2026Article
- Identification of Allergenic Proteins in Velvet Mesquite (Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Joint protection strategies for Saccharomyces boulardii: exogenous encapsulation and endogenous biofilm structure.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2021Article
- Nanoproteomic Approach for Isolation and Identification of Potential Biomarkers in Human Urine from Adults with Normal Weight, Overweight and Obesity.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Proteomic identification of allergenic proteins in red oak (The World Allergy Organization journal · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Probiotics are live microorganisms conferring health benefits when administered in adequate amounts. However, the passage through the gastrointestinal tract represents a challenge due to pH variations, proteases, and bile salts. This study aimed to evaluate the proteomic response of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.