Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31093270›Full record

ArticleNeural plasticity2019

Different Brain Connectivity between Responders and Nonresponders to Dual-Mode Noninvasive Brain Stimulation over Bilateral Primary Motor Cortices in Stroke Patients.

Jungsoo Lee, Ahee Lee, Heegoo Kim, Mina Shin, Sang Moon Yun, Youngjin Jung, Won Hyuk Chang, Yun-Hee Kim

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural plasticity, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03390192 nacompletednot on this map

Investigation for Individualized Noninvasive Neuromodulation in Neurorehabilitation of Brain Disease: Longitudinal Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorSamsung Medical CenterRan2015 to 2018Enrolled43ConditionsStrokeArmsDual-mode stimulation, Single sham stimulation
NCT04944680 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Motor Imagery for the Recovery of Upper Limb Function of Stroke Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorFu Xing Hospital, Capital Medical UniversityRan2021 to 2024Enrolled80ConditionsStroke, Upper Extremity Dysfunction, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, Image, BodyArmsTranscranial Direct Current Stimulation therapy, Motor imagery therapy, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and motor imagery therapy
NCT05410054 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Prognostic Analysis of Upper Limb Motor Dysfunction After Stroke Based on Dynamic Connection of Motion Network

TypeobservationalSponsorFu Xing Hospital, Capital Medical UniversityRan2022 to 2025Enrolled178ConditionsStroke, Rehabilitation, Tobacco Use, Upper Extremity DysfunctionArmsno intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jungsoo LeeDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Prevention and Rehabilitation, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9439-0166
Ahee LeeDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, Department of Medical Device Management & Research, Department of Digital Health, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea.
Heegoo KimDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, Department of Medical Device Management & Research, Department of Digital Health, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea.
Mina ShinDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Prevention and Rehabilitation, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea.
Sang Moon YunDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Prevention and Rehabilitation, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea.
Youngjin JungDepartment of Global Prestige Radiological Science, Dongseo University, 47 Jurye-ro, Sasang-gu, Busan 47011, Republic of Korea.
Won Hyuk ChangDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Prevention and Rehabilitation, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea.
Yun-Hee KimDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Prevention and Rehabilitation, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6101-8851
Samsung Medical Center · KRSungkyunkwan University · KRDongseo University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Noninvasive brain stimulation (NBS), such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) or transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), has been used in stroke patients with motor impairment. NBS can help recovery from brain damage by modulating cortical excitability. However, the efficacy of NBS varies among individuals. To obtain insights of responsiveness to the efficacy of NBS, we investigated characteristic changes of the motor network in responders and nonresponders of NBS over the primary motor cortex (M1). A total of 21 patients with subacute stroke (13 males, mean age 59.6 ± 11.5 years) received NBS in the same manner: 1 Hz rTMS on the contralesional M1 and anodal tDCS on the ipsilesional M1. Participants were classified into responders and nonresponders based on the functional improvement of the affected upper extremity after applying NBS. Twelve age-matched healthy controls (8 males, mean age 56.1 ± 14.3 years) were also recruited. Motor networks were constructed using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. M1 intrahemispheric connectivity, interhemispheric connectivity, and network efficiency were measured to investigate differences in network characteristics between groups. The motor network characteristics were found to differ between both groups. Specifically, M1 intrahemispheric connectivity in responders showed a noticeable imbalance between affected and unaffected hemispheres, which was markedly restored after NBS. The responders also showed greater interhemispheric connectivity and higher efficiency of the motor network than the nonresponders. These results may provide insight on patient-specific NBS treatment based on the brain network characteristics in neurorehabilitation of patients with stroke. This trial is registered with trial registration number NCT03390192.

Indexed as

Transcranial Direct Current StimulationTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAgedBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMotor CortexNeural PathwaysStroke

Identifiers

PMID31093270
PMCPMC6476041
OpenAlexW2930457015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.