Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31093250›Full record

ReviewRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health2019

Intimate partner violence in the Americas: a systematic review and reanalysis of national prevalence estimates.

Sarah Bott, Alessandra Guedes, Ana P Ruiz-Celis, Jennifer Adams Mendoza

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Trend and spatial pattern of intimate partner rape notifications against women in Northeast Brazil (2013-2022).Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah BottIndependent consultant to the Pan American Health Organization Independent consultant to the Pan American Health Organization WashingtonD.C. United States of America Independent consultant to the Pan American Health Organization, Washington, D.C., United States of America.
Alessandra GuedesPan American Health Organization Pan American Health Organization WashingtonD.C. United States of America Pan American Health Organization, Washington, D.C., United States of America.
Ana P Ruiz-CelisIndependent consultant to the Pan American Health Organization Independent consultant to the Pan American Health Organization WashingtonD.C. United States of America Independent consultant to the Pan American Health Organization, Washington, D.C., United States of America.
Jennifer Adams MendozaIndependent consultant to the Pan American Health Organization Independent consultant to the Pan American Health Organization WashingtonD.C. United States of America Independent consultant to the Pan American Health Organization, Washington, D.C., United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo describe what is known about the national prevalence of intimate partner violence (IPV) against women in the Americas across countries and over time, including the geographic coverage, quality, and comparability of national data.

methodsThis was a systematic review and reanalysis of national, population-based IPV estimates from 1998 - 2017 in the Americas. Estimates were reanalyzed for comparability or extracted from reports, including IPV prevalence by type (physical; sexual; physical and/or sexual), timeframe (ever; past year), and perpetrator (any partner in life; current/most recent partner). In countries with 3+ rounds of data, Cochran-Armitage and Pearson chi-square tests were used to assess whether changes over time were significant (

resultsEligible surveys were found in 24 countries. Women reported ever having experienced physical and/or sexual IPV at rates that ranged from 14% - 17% of women in Brazil, Panama, and Uruguay to over one-half (58.5%) in Bolivia. Past-year prevalence of physical and/or sexual IPV ranged from 1.1% in Canada to 27.1% in Bolivia. Preliminary evidence suggests a possible decline in reported prevalence of certain types of IPV in eight countries; however, some changes were small, some indicators did not change significantly, and a significant increase was found in the reported prevalence of past-year physical IPV in the Dominican Republic.

conclusionsIPV against women remains a public health and human rights problem across the Americas; however, the evidence base has gaps, suggesting a need for more comparable, high quality evidence for mobilizing and monitoring violence prevention and response.

Indexed as

AmericasCaribbean regiondomestic violenceIntimate partner violenceLatin Americasurveys and questionnairesviolence against women

Identifiers

PMID31093250
PMCPMC6425989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.