ReviewRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health2019
[Human papillomavirus vaccine receptivity: a systematic reviewReceptividad con respecto a la vacuna contra el virus del papiloma humano: revisión sistemática].
Review in Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Effect of educational intervention for compliance of school adolescents with the human papillomavirus vaccine.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2022Trial
- Analysis of the vaccination situation against Mpox in people living with HIV/AIDS: an ecological study.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2024Article
- The Effect of Health Education on Adolescents' Awareness of HPV Infections and Attitudes towards HPV Vaccination in Greece.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo characterize the receptivity to human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine and to describe factors that hinder or facilitate receptivity.
methodA systematic review was performed based on the 2015 PRISMA protocol. MEDLINE and Web of Science were searched using combinations of the terms papillomavirus, vaccine, adherence, and acceptance to identify articles published from 2006 to 2017. Original articles published in any language were included, and duplicate articles were excluded. Information was collected regarding article identification, methodological design, sample characteristics, and description of contents. Receptivity was characterized in terms of acceptance and adherence.
resultsOf 212 articles identified, 10 were selected for analysis. Most showed favorable, but heterogeneous, receptivity, with more acceptance than adherence, especially on the part of female adolescents. The analysis identified 11 facilitators and nine barriers to receptivity, especially knowledge of the theme and individual pattern of behavior regarding the problem. The analysis also detected the absence of a standardized method to evaluate receptivity and the imprecision of the concepts associated with acceptance and adherence. Therefore, a definition was proposed for acceptance (voluntary intention of receiving the vaccine or agreement that the vaccine is a good prevention strategy) and adherence (initiation and completion of the vaccination scheme).
conclusionsAdditional studies are required to further investigate predictors of receptivity. For that, the development of an instrument based on the perceptions of target publics and employing precise concepts of acceptance and adherence is recommended, so as to allow a better understanding of the phenomenon and stimulate adherence and the achievement of adequate vaccine coverage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.