Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31093246›Full record

ReviewRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health2019

[Human papillomavirus vaccine receptivity: a systematic reviewReceptividad con respecto a la vacuna contra el virus del papiloma humano: revisión sistemática].

Lídia Ester Lopes da Silva, Maria Liz Cunha de Oliveira, Dayani Galato

Open access · diamondAbstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lídia Ester Lopes da SilvaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências e Tecnologia da Saúde (PPGCTS) PPGCTS Faculdade de Ceilândia (FCE) Universidade de Brasília (UnB) BrasíliaDF Brasil Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Faculdade de Ceilândia (FCE), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências e Tecnologia da Saúde (PPGCTS), Brasília (DF), Brasil.
Maria Liz Cunha de OliveiraPrograma de Mestrado Profissional em Ciências da Saúde Programa de Mestrado Profissional em Ciências da Saúde Escola Superior de Ciências da Saúde (ESCS) BrasíliaDF Brasil Escola Superior de Ciências da Saúde (ESCS), Programa de Mestrado Profissional em Ciências da Saúde, Brasília (DF), Brasil.
Dayani GalatoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências e Tecnologia da Saúde (PPGCTS) PPGCTS Faculdade de Ceilândia (FCE) Universidade de Brasília (UnB) BrasíliaDF Brasil Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Faculdade de Ceilândia (FCE), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências e Tecnologia da Saúde (PPGCTS), Brasília (DF), Brasil.
Universidade de Brasília · BREscola Superior de Ciências da Saúde · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo characterize the receptivity to human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine and to describe factors that hinder or facilitate receptivity.

methodA systematic review was performed based on the 2015 PRISMA protocol. MEDLINE and Web of Science were searched using combinations of the terms papillomavirus, vaccine, adherence, and acceptance to identify articles published from 2006 to 2017. Original articles published in any language were included, and duplicate articles were excluded. Information was collected regarding article identification, methodological design, sample characteristics, and description of contents. Receptivity was characterized in terms of acceptance and adherence.

resultsOf 212 articles identified, 10 were selected for analysis. Most showed favorable, but heterogeneous, receptivity, with more acceptance than adherence, especially on the part of female adolescents. The analysis identified 11 facilitators and nine barriers to receptivity, especially knowledge of the theme and individual pattern of behavior regarding the problem. The analysis also detected the absence of a standardized method to evaluate receptivity and the imprecision of the concepts associated with acceptance and adherence. Therefore, a definition was proposed for acceptance (voluntary intention of receiving the vaccine or agreement that the vaccine is a good prevention strategy) and adherence (initiation and completion of the vaccination scheme).

conclusionsAdditional studies are required to further investigate predictors of receptivity. For that, the development of an instrument based on the perceptions of target publics and employing precise concepts of acceptance and adherence is recommended, so as to allow a better understanding of the phenomenon and stimulate adherence and the achievement of adequate vaccine coverage.

Indexed as

papillomaviridaepatient acceptance of health carepatient complianceVaccines

Identifiers

PMID31093246
PMCPMC6459371
OpenAlexW2913808036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.