ReviewRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health2018
[Telehealth as state response strategy: systematic reviewLa telesalud como estrategia de respuesta del Estado: revisión sistemática].
Review in Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04173806 (Development and Evaluation of an Online Telemedicine Course Through Facebook), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Development and Evaluation of an Online Telemedicine Course Through Facebook: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Barriers and facilitators to utilizing digital health technologies by healthcare professionals.NPJ digital medicine · 2023Review
- [Mobile technologies in healthcare: reflections on development, application, legal aspects, and ethicsTecnologías sanitarias móviles: reflexiones sobre desarrollo, aplicación, legislación y ética].Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2022Article
- E-Health Practices and Technologies: A Systematic Review from 2014 to 2019.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Knowledge levels among elderly people with Diabetes Mellitus concerning COVID-19: an educational intervention via a teleservice.Acta diabetologica · 2021Observational
- Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Definitions of e-Health and m-Health.Healthcare informatics research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo identify telehealth initiatives described in the literature as a strategy for national health policies.
methodA systematic review was performed to identify articles focusing on the use of telehealth as a state response strategy to health problems or needs. The Virtual Health Library, PubMed, and Google Scholar were searched using the following keywords: "telessaude politicas", "implantacao telessaude", "telehealth policy", "telehealth America", "telehealth Asia", "telehealth Antartida", "telehealth Europe", "telehealth Africa", "telehealth Oceania". Data collection was performed from March 2016 to February 2017.
resultsTwenty-one articles describing telehealth initiatives in various countries, published in Portuguese, Spanish, and English, were analyzed. Concentration of studies on specific areas or regions was not detected. Most articles were published from 2014 to 2017. Telehealth initiatives have been used mainly to decrease health costs, for continued education of health care professionals, consultations between health care professionals, to strengthen primary health care, and to improve the access to health care in remote areas.
conclusionsTelehealth is used as state policy across the five continents, with variations in the degree of implementation. The main differences in telehealth among countries refer to infrastructure, financing, engagement of patients and caretakers, and position of the state regarding the role of telehealth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.