Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31093112›Full record

ReviewRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health2018

[Telehealth as state response strategy: systematic reviewLa telesalud como estrategia de respuesta del Estado: revisión sistemática].

Rafaela Santana Celes, Thaís Regis Aranha Rossi, Sandra Garrido de Barros, Carla Maria Lima Santos, Carla Cardoso

Registry-linked trialAbstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04173806 (Development and Evaluation of an Online Telemedicine Course Through Facebook), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04173806 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Development and Evaluation of an Online Telemedicine Course Through Facebook: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad Peruana Cayetano HerediaRan2019 to 2020Enrolled100ConditionsTelemedicine, TrainingArmsFacebook intervention, Control Training:
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rafaela Santana CelesUniversidade do Estado da Bahia, Programa de Residência Multiprofissional, Salvador (BA), Brasil.
Thaís Regis Aranha RossiUniversidade do Estado da Bahia, Departamento de Ciências da Vida, Salvador (BA), Brasil.
Sandra Garrido de BarrosUniversidade Federal da Bahia (UFBa), Faculdade de Odontologia, Departamento de Odontologia Social e Pediátrica, Salvador (BA), Brasil.
Carla Maria Lima SantosUniversidade do Estado da Bahia, Departamento de Ciências da Vida, Salvador (BA), Brasil.
Carla CardosoUniversidade do Estado da Bahia, Departamento de Ciências da Vida, Salvador (BA), Brasil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify telehealth initiatives described in the literature as a strategy for national health policies.

methodA systematic review was performed to identify articles focusing on the use of telehealth as a state response strategy to health problems or needs. The Virtual Health Library, PubMed, and Google Scholar were searched using the following keywords: "telessaude politicas", "implantacao telessaude", "telehealth policy", "telehealth America", "telehealth Asia", "telehealth Antartida", "telehealth Europe", "telehealth Africa", "telehealth Oceania". Data collection was performed from March 2016 to February 2017.

resultsTwenty-one articles describing telehealth initiatives in various countries, published in Portuguese, Spanish, and English, were analyzed. Concentration of studies on specific areas or regions was not detected. Most articles were published from 2014 to 2017. Telehealth initiatives have been used mainly to decrease health costs, for continued education of health care professionals, consultations between health care professionals, to strengthen primary health care, and to improve the access to health care in remote areas.

conclusionsTelehealth is used as state policy across the five continents, with variations in the degree of implementation. The main differences in telehealth among countries refer to infrastructure, financing, engagement of patients and caretakers, and position of the state regarding the role of telehealth.

Indexed as

health policyhealth resourcesTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID31093112
PMCPMC6385855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.