ArticleJournal of toxicologic pathology2019
Establishment of the Global SEND Alliance (G-SEND) in Japan and efficient creation of electronic SEND datasets between CROs.
Article in Journal of toxicologic pathology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Drug review process advancement and required manufacturer and contract research oraganization responses.Journal of toxicologic pathology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Standard for Exchange of Nonclinical Data (SEND), adopted by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), is a set of regulations for digitalization and standardization of nonclinical study data; thus, related organizations have begun implementing processes in support of SEND. The Global Editorial and Steering Committee (GESC), which provides oversight of the International Harmonization of Nomenclature and Diagnostic Criteria (INHAND), has prepared the SEND Controlled Terminology (CT) for toxicologic pathology. SEND provides electronic data standards created by the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC), and CDISC also collaborates in the implementation of SEND. Furthermore, the Pharmaceutical Users Software Exchange (PhUSE), which includes members of the US FDA, has conducted various activities to promote realistic and effective methods to implement SEND. As we reported in 2015, there is a significant variation in the efficiency and quality of SEND data implementation across pharmaceutical companies and contractors (CROs) globally. To address this problem, the Global SEND Alliance (G-SEND) was established in August 2018 to facilitate the coordination and standardization of SEND datasets across CROs in Asia. This paper reports the first method for organizationally and jointly creating consistent SEND datasets between CROs using G-SEND.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.