Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31092891›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Segmental differences of cervical spinal cord motion: advancing from confounders to a diagnostic tool.

M Hupp, K Vallotton, C Brockmann, S Huwyler, J Rosner, R Sutter, M Klarhoefer, P Freund, M Farshad, A Curt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Comparison of axial and sagittal spinal cord motion measurements in degenerative cervical myelopathy.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Restless Spinal Cord in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

M HuppSpinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland. Markus.Hupp@gmx.de.
K VallottonSpinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
C BrockmannSpinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
S HuwylerSpinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
J RosnerSpinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
R SutterRadiology, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
M KlarhoeferSiemens Healthcare AG, Zurich, Switzerland.
P FreundSpinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
M FarshadUniversity Spine Centre Zurich, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
A CurtSpinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increased cranio-caudal spinal cord motion is associated with clinical impairment in degenerative cervical myelopathy. However, whether spinal cord motion holds potential as a neuroimaging biomarker requires further validation. Different confounders (i.e. subject characteristics, methodological problems such as phase drift, etc.) on spinal cord motion readouts have to be considered. Twenty-two healthy subjects underwent phase contrast MRI, a subset of subjects (N = 9) had repeated scans. Parameters of interest included amplitude of velocity signal, maximum cranial respectively maximum caudal velocity, displacement (=area under curve of the velocity signal). The cervical spinal cord showed pulse synchronic oscillatory motions with significant differences in all readouts across cervical segments, with a maximum at C5. The Inter-rater reliability was excellent for all readouts. The test-retest reliability was excellent for all parameters at C2 to C6, but not for maximum cranial velocity at C6 and all readouts at C7. Spinal cord motion was correlated with spinal canal size, heart rate and body size. This is the first study to propose a standardized MRI measurement of spinal cord motion for further clinical implementation based on satisfactory phase drift correction and excellent reliability. Understanding the influence of confounders (e.g. structural conditions of the spine) is essential for introducing cord motion into the diagnostic work up.

Indexed as

Cervical VertebraeFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMovementSpinal CordSpinal Cord Diseases

Identifiers

PMID31092891
PMCPMC6520379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.