Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31092885›Full record

ArticleActa pharmacologica Sinica2019

Increased BBB permeability contributes to EGCG-caused cognitive function improvement in natural aging rats: pharmacokinetic and distribution analyses.

Bin-Bin Wei, Ming-Yan Liu, Xin Zhong, Wei-Fan Yao, Min-Jie Wei

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta pharmacologica Sinica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Beneficial Effects of Epigallocatechin-3-Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bin-Bin WeiSchool of Pharmacy, China Medical University, Shenyang 110122, China.
Ming-Yan LiuSchool of Pharmacy, China Medical University, Shenyang 110122, China.
Xin ZhongSchool of Pharmacy, China Medical University, Shenyang 110122, China.
Wei-Fan YaoSchool of Pharmacy, China Medical University, Shenyang 110122, China.
Min-Jie WeiSchool of Pharmacy, China Medical University, Shenyang 110122, China. minjie_wei@163.com.
China Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies report that (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), the most abundant polyphenolic ingredient in green tea, has high efficacy against Alzheimer's disease (AD) in various in vivo and in vitro models. However, as a water-soluble component, how EGCG exerts its anti-AD effects in the brain was not elucidated. In the present study, we investigated the anti-AD mechanisms of EGCG in natural aging rats with cognitive impairments (CIs) assessed using Morris water maze. The rats were treated with EGCG (100 mg/kg per day, intragastrically) for 4 weeks. The expression of β-amyloid (Aβ

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesAnimalsBlood-Brain BarrierCatechinCerebral CortexCognitionHippocampusMaleMaze LearningMemoryNeuroprotective AgentsNootropic AgentsPeptide FragmentsRats, Sprague-DawleyAmyloid beta-Peptidesamyloid beta-protein (1-42)Catechinepigallocatechin gallateNeuroprotective AgentsNootropic AgentsPeptide FragmentsAlzheimer’s diseaseAβ1-42 plaqueblood brain barriercognitive impairmentsdrug distributionEGCGnatural aging rats

Identifiers

PMID31092885
PMCPMC6888860
OpenAlexW2945420937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.