Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31092876›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Risk factors for in-brain local progression in elderly patients after resection of cerebral metastases.

Christopher Munoz-Bendix, Marion Rapp, Hendrik-Jan Mijderwijk, Christiane von Sass, Maxine Dibué-Adjei, Jan Frederick Cornelius, Hans-Jakob Steiger, Bernd Turowski, Michael Sabel, Marcel A Kamp

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christopher Munoz-BendixDepartment of Neurosurgery, Heinrich Heine University Hospital, Dusseldorf, Germany. christopher.munoz@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2414-2463
Marion RappDepartment of Neurosurgery, Heinrich Heine University Hospital, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Hendrik-Jan MijderwijkDepartment of Neurosurgery, Heinrich Heine University Hospital, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Christiane von SassDepartment of Neurosurgery, Heinrich Heine University Hospital, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Maxine Dibué-AdjeiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Heinrich Heine University Hospital, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Jan Frederick CorneliusDepartment of Neurosurgery, Heinrich Heine University Hospital, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Hans-Jakob SteigerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Heinrich Heine University Hospital, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Bernd TurowskiInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heinrich Heine University Hospital, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Michael SabelDepartment of Neurosurgery, Heinrich Heine University Hospital, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Marcel A KampDepartment of Neurosurgery, Heinrich Heine University Hospital, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Düsseldorf University Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracranial metastases are the most frequent brain tumor with recurrence rates after treatment of around 40-60%. Age is still considered a determinant of treatment and prognosis in this pathology. Recent studies analyzing the impact of metastasectomy in elderly patients focused on reporting perioperative mortality and morbidity rates but not on the evaluation of oncological outcome parameters. Aim of this study is to determine risk factors for in-brain local recurrence after brain surgery in this sub-population. From October 2009 until September 2016 all patients aged 65 years and above with histopathologically confirmed metastasis after surgical resection were retrospectively studied. Clinical, radiological and perioperative information was collected and statistically analysed. Follow-up consisted of clinical and radiological assessment every 3-months following surgery. 78 patients were included, of these 50% were female (39 patients). Median age was 71 years (66-83). Early postoperative-MRI verified a complete surgical resection in 41 patients (52.6%) and showed a tumor-remnant in 15 patients (19.2%). In 22 patients the MRI result was inconclusive (28.2%). None of the patients experienced severe complications due to surgery. The median postoperative NIHSS was adequate 1 ± 1.4 (0-6), nonetheless, insignificantly improved in comparison to the preoperative NIHSS (p = 0.16). A total of 20 patients (25.6%) presented local recurrence. The only statistically significant factor for development of local in-brain recurrence after resection of cerebral metastases in patients above 65 years of age was a tumor-remnant in the early postoperative MRI (p = 0.00005). Median overall survival was 13 months. Local in-brain recurrence after surgical resection of a cerebral metastasis in patients above 65 years of age was 25.6%. In our analysis, tumor-remnant in early postoperative MRI is the only risk factor for local in-brain recurrence. Oncological parameters in the present cohort do not seem to differ from recent phase III studies with non-geriatric patients. Nevertheless, controlled studies on the impact of metastasectomy in elderly patients delivering high quality reliable data are required.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBrainBrain NeoplasmsDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID31092876
PMCPMC6520351
OpenAlexW2945542500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.