Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31092869›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

RAD sequencing sheds new light on the genetic structure and local adaptation of European scallops and resolves their demographic histories.

David L J Vendrami, Michele De Noia, Luca Telesca, William Handal, Grégory Charrier, Pierre Boudry, Luke Eberhart-Phillips, Joseph I Hoffman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. RAD sequencing of common whelk,Ecology and evolution · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Community Parameters and Genome-Wide RAD-Seq Loci ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

David L J VendramiDepartment of Animal Behavior, University of Bielefeld, Postfach 100131, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany. david.vendrami@student.unife.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9409-4084
Michele De NoiaDepartment of Animal Behavior, University of Bielefeld, Postfach 100131, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany.
Luca TelescaDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EQ, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9060-2261
William HandalUniversity of Brest, Laboratoire des Sciences de l'Environnement Marin (LEMAR, UMR 6539, UBO/CNRS/IRD/Ifremer), European University Institute for the Sea (IUEM), rue Dumont d'Urville, 29280, Plouzané, France.
Grégory CharrierUniversity of Brest, Laboratoire des Sciences de l'Environnement Marin (LEMAR, UMR 6539, UBO/CNRS/IRD/Ifremer), European University Institute for the Sea (IUEM), rue Dumont d'Urville, 29280, Plouzané, France.
Pierre BoudryIfremer, Laboratoire des Sciences de l'Environnement Marin (UBO/CNRS/IRD/Ifremer), Plouzané, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5150-2276
Luke Eberhart-PhillipsDepartment of Evolutionary Ecology and Behavioural Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Seewiesen, Germany.
Joseph I HoffmanDepartment of Animal Behavior, University of Bielefeld, Postfach 100131, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5895-8949

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent developments in genomics are advancing our understanding of the processes shaping population structure in wild organisms. In particular, reduced representation sequencing has facilitated the generation of dense genetic marker datasets that provide greater power for resolving population structure, investigating the role of selection and reconstructing demographic histories. We therefore used RAD sequencing to study the great scallop Pecten maximus and its sister species P. jacobeus along a latitudinal cline in Europe. Analysis of 219 samples genotyped at 82,439 single nucleotide polymorphisms clearly resolved an Atlantic and a Norwegian group within P. maximus as well as P. jacobeus, in support of previous studies. Fine-scale structure was also detected, including pronounced differences involving Mulroy Bay in Ireland, where scallops are commercially cultured. Furthermore, we identified a suite of 279 environmentally associated loci that resolved a contrasting phylogenetic pattern to the remaining neutral loci, consistent with ecologically mediated divergence. Finally, demographic inference provided support for the two P. maximus groups having diverged during the last glacial maximum and subsequently expanded, whereas P. jacobeus diverged around 95,000 generations ago and experienced less pronounced expansion. Our results provide an integrative perspective on the factors shaping genome-wide differentiation in a commercially important marine invertebrate.

Indexed as

AcclimatizationAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsAtlantic OceanDemographyEuropeGenetic MarkersGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationGenomeGenomicsGenotypeNorth SeaPectinidaePhylogenyRestriction MappingGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID31092869
PMCPMC6520335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.