Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31092837›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Computed tomography porosity and spherical indentation for determining cortical bone millimetre-scale mechanical properties.

Oliver R Boughton, Shaocheng Ma, Xiran Cai, Liye Yan, Laura Peralta, Pascal Laugier, James Marrow, Finn Giuliani, Ulrich Hansen, Richard L Abel and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Bone organic matrix quality indices associate with fragility fracture occurrence independently of bone mineral density values.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Loss of bone density and bone strength following premenopausal risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy: a prospective controlled study (WHAM Study).Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Oliver R BoughtonThe MSk Lab, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom. o.boughton@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0098-1438
Shaocheng MaThe MSk Lab, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Xiran CaiSorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale, F-75006, Paris, France.
Liye YanDepartment of Materials, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Laura PeraltaSorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale, F-75006, Paris, France.
Pascal LaugierSorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale, F-75006, Paris, France.
James MarrowDepartment of Materials, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6120-9826
Finn GiulianiCentre for Advanced Structural Ceramics, Department of Materials, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ulrich HansenThe Biomechanics Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Richard L AbelThe MSk Lab, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Quentin GrimalSorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale, F-75006, Paris, France.
Justin P CobbThe MSk Lab, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6095-8822
Imperial College London · GBCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

The Dunhill Medical Trust DMT/RCS602
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cortex of the femoral neck is a key structural element of the human body, yet there is not a reliable metric for predicting the mechanical properties of the bone in this critical region. This study explored the use of a range of non-destructive metrics to measure femoral neck cortical bone stiffness at the millimetre length scale. A range of testing methods and imaging techniques were assessed for their ability to measure or predict the mechanical properties of cortical bone samples obtained from the femoral neck of hip replacement patients. Techniques that can potentially be applied in vivo to measure bone stiffness, including computed tomography (CT), bulk wave ultrasound (BWUS) and indentation, were compared against in vitro techniques, including compression testing, density measurements and resonant ultrasound spectroscopy. Porosity, as measured by micro-CT, correlated with femoral neck cortical bone's elastic modulus and ultimate compressive strength at the millimetre length scale. Large-tip spherical indentation also correlated with bone mechanical properties at this length scale but to a lesser extent. As the elastic mechanical properties of cortical bone correlated with porosity, we would recommend further development of technologies that can safely measure cortical porosity in vivo.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBiomechanical PhenomenaCompressive StrengthCortical BoneFemaleFemur NeckHumansMaleMiddle AgedPorosityTomography, X-Ray ComputedX-Ray Microtomography

Identifiers

PMID31092837
PMCPMC6520408
OpenAlexW2945797439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.