Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31092743›Full record

Observational studyJournal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis2020

Association between High Platelet Reactivity Following Dual Antiplatelet Therapy and Ischemic Events in Japanese Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Stent Implantation.

Masakatsu Nishikawa, Yoshihiro Takeda, Naoei Isomura, Takashi Tanigawa, Mamoru Nanasato, Kengo Tsukahara, Kazuo Kimura, Tadateru Takayama, Atsushi Hirayama, Masafumi Kato and 5 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Monitoring of Antithrombotic Therapy.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2020
    Article
  9. What is the Sweet Spot for Platelet Reactivity in Japanese Patients?Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Masakatsu NishikawaClinical Research Support Center, Mie University Hospital.
Yoshihiro TakedaDepartment of Cardiology, Rinku General Medical Center.
Naoei IsomuraDepartment of Cardiology, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital.
Takashi TanigawaDepartment of Cardiology, Mie University Faculty of Medicine.
Mamoru NanasatoCardiovascular Center, Japanese Red Cross Nagoya Daini Hospital.
Kengo TsukaharaYokohama City University Medical Center.
Kazuo KimuraYokohama City University Medical Center.
Tadateru TakayamaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nihon University Itabashi Hospital.
Atsushi HirayamaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nihon University Itabashi Hospital.
Masafumi KatoMie Heart Center.
Hideo NishikawaMie Heart Center.
Yuki NishimuraClinical Research Support Center, Mie University Hospital.
Takaaki IsshikiDivision of Cardiology, Teikyo University Hospital.
Hiroyoshi YokoiCardiovascular Center, Fukuoka Sanno Hospital.
j-CHIPS group
Mie University Hospital · JPNihon University Itabashi Hospital · JPJapanese Red Cross Nagoya Daini Hospital · JPKokura Memorial Hospital · JPMie University · JPShowa University Northern Yokohama Hospital · JPTeikyo University Hospital · JPYokohama City University · JPYokohama City University Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimAlthough high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) correlates with long-term adverse outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, the correlation in Japanese patients remains unclear. Therefore, we examined the relationship between platelet reactivity during DAPT with aspirin and clopidogrel and 1-year clinical outcomes following successful coronary stent implantation.

methodsA prospective, multicenter registry study (j-CHIPS) was conducted in patients undergoing coronary stenting and receiving aspirin and clopidogrel at 16 hospitals in Japan. A VerifyNow point-of-care assay was used to assess platelet reactivity, and a cutoff value to define HTPR was established.

resultsBetween February 2011 and May 2013, 1047 patients were prospectively enrolled, of which 854 patients with platelet function evaluation at 12-24 h after PCI were included in the final analysis. After 1 year of follow-up, the incidence of the primary endpoint (a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and ischemic stroke) was significantly higher in patients with HTPR than in those without (5.9% vs. 1.5%, p=0.008), and HTPR showed a modest ability to discriminate between patients who did and did not experience major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (area under the curve, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.511-0.688, p=0.039). HTPR status did not identify patients at risk for major or minor bleeding events.

conclusionHTPR was significantly associated with adverse ischemic outcomes at 1 year after PCI in Japanese patients receiving maintenance DAPT, indicating its potential as a prognostic indicator of clinical outcomes in this high-risk patient population.

Indexed as

AgedAspirinClopidogrelCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPlatelet Function TestsStentsStrokeAspirinClopidogrelPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsCoronary stent implantationDual antiplatelet therapyHigh on-treatment platelet reactivity

Identifiers

PMID31092743
PMCPMC6976717
OpenAlexW2945018952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.