Observational studyJournal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis2020
Association between High Platelet Reactivity Following Dual Antiplatelet Therapy and Ischemic Events in Japanese Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Stent Implantation.
Observational study in Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of opioids on P2Y12 receptor inhibition in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction who are pre-treated with crushed ticagrelor: Opioids aNd crushed Ticagrelor In Myocardial infarction Evaluation (ON-TIME 3) trial.European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy · 2022Trial
- Sex Differences in Bleeding Risk Associated With Antithrombotic Therapy Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Circulation reports · 2024Review
- Prognostic Implication of Platelet Reactivity According to Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction Status in Patients Treated With Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: Analysis of the PTRG-DES Consortium.Journal of Korean medical science · 2024Article
- Impact of Platelet Hyperreactivity and Diabetes Mellitus on Ischemic Stroke Recurrence: A Single-Center Cohort Clinical Study.International journal of general medicine · 2024Article
- Current and Future Insights for Optimizing Antithrombotic Therapy to Reduce the Burden of Cardiovascular Ischemic Events in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Differential Impact of Clinical and Genetic Factors on High Platelet Reactivity in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Treated with Clopidogrel and Prasugrel.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2022Article
- Association of KDR rs1870377 genotype with clopidogrel resistance in patients with post percutaneous coronary intervention.Heliyon · 2021Article
- Monitoring of Antithrombotic Therapy.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2020Article
- What is the Sweet Spot for Platelet Reactivity in Japanese Patients?Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimAlthough high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) correlates with long-term adverse outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, the correlation in Japanese patients remains unclear. Therefore, we examined the relationship between platelet reactivity during DAPT with aspirin and clopidogrel and 1-year clinical outcomes following successful coronary stent implantation.
methodsA prospective, multicenter registry study (j-CHIPS) was conducted in patients undergoing coronary stenting and receiving aspirin and clopidogrel at 16 hospitals in Japan. A VerifyNow point-of-care assay was used to assess platelet reactivity, and a cutoff value to define HTPR was established.
resultsBetween February 2011 and May 2013, 1047 patients were prospectively enrolled, of which 854 patients with platelet function evaluation at 12-24 h after PCI were included in the final analysis. After 1 year of follow-up, the incidence of the primary endpoint (a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and ischemic stroke) was significantly higher in patients with HTPR than in those without (5.9% vs. 1.5%, p=0.008), and HTPR showed a modest ability to discriminate between patients who did and did not experience major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (area under the curve, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.511-0.688, p=0.039). HTPR status did not identify patients at risk for major or minor bleeding events.
conclusionHTPR was significantly associated with adverse ischemic outcomes at 1 year after PCI in Japanese patients receiving maintenance DAPT, indicating its potential as a prognostic indicator of clinical outcomes in this high-risk patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.