ArticleBMJ open2019
Multinational comparison of new antidepressant use in older adults: a cohort study.
Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of Antidepressant Prescriptions for Community-Dwelling Adults Diagnosed with Depressive Disorder in the UK: A Systematic Review.The Psychiatric quarterly · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of antidepressants for pain in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2024Pooled it
- Antidepressant use and dementia, cognitive measures, and neuroimaging outcomes: A population-based cohort study.Psychological medicine · 2026Article
- Sex, gender, and sociodemographic factors associated with repeated prescription refills in chronic pain: insights from a prescription claims cohort study.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Patterns of sex-specific and age-specific risk indicators of suicide: a population-nested case-control study.BMJ mental health · 2025Article
- International Trends in Antidepressant Consumption: a 10-year Comparative Analysis (2010-2020).The Psychiatric quarterly · 2025Observational
- Association between driving and depression in older adults: findings from an ancillary study of a prospective cohort.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Uncovering antidepressant prescription patterns: a three-year analysis of outpatient trends.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- The relationship between relational continuity and family physician follow-up after an antidepressant prescription in older adults: a retrospective cohort study.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Prevalence, trends, and individual patterns of long-term antidepressant medication use in the adult Swiss general population.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2023Article
- Trends, Patterns and Associated User Characteristics of Antidepressant Prescriptions in Older Adults: A Nationwide Descriptive Cohort Study in Denmark.Drugs & aging · 2023Article
- Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of antidepressants for pain in adults: overview of systematic reviews.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2023Review
- A National Retrospective Study of Antidepressants' Effects on Overdose and Self-Harm Among Adults Treated With Opioid Analgesics.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2023Article
- Treatment indications and potential off-label use of antidepressants among older adults: A population-based descriptive study in Denmark.International journal of geriatric psychiatry · 2022Article
- A comparative analysis of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and fall risk in older adults.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2022Article
- An analysis of antidepressant prescribing trends in England 2015-2019.Journal of affective disorders reports · 2021Article
- Older adults respond better to psychological therapy than working-age adults: evidence from a large sample of mental health service attendees.Journal of affective disorders · 2021Article
- Epidemiology of undiagnosed depression in people with diabetes mellitus: a comparative analysis of Ireland, England and the USA.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Changes in mood and health-related quality of life in Look AHEAD 6 years after termination of the lifestyle intervention.Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesWe used an international pharmacosurveillance network to estimate the rate and characteristics of antidepressant use in older adults in countries with more conservative (UK) and liberal depression guidelines (Canada, USA).
settingElectronic health records and population-based administrative data from six jurisdictions in four countries (UK, Taiwan, USA and Canada).
participantsA historical cohort of older adults (≥65 years) who had a new episode of antidepressant use between 2009 and 2014. OUTCOME MEASURES: The age and sex-standardised cumulative incidence of new episodes of antidepressant use in older adults was measured. Descriptive statistics were used to compare the proportion of new users by the antidepressant prescribed, therapeutic class, potential treatment indication and country, as well as the characteristics of the first treatment episode (standardised daily doses, duration and changes).
resultsThe incidence of antidepressant use between 2009 and 2014 varied from 4.7% (Montreal and Quebec City) to 18.6% (Taiwan). Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) were the most commonly used class in the UK (48.8%) and Taiwan (52.4%) compared with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in North American jurisdictions (42.3%-53.3%). Chronic pain was the most common potential treatment indication (41.2%-68.2%). Among users with chronic pain, TCAs were used most frequently in the UK and Taiwan (55.2%-60.4%), whereas SSRIs were used most frequently in North America (33.5%-46.4%). Treatment was longer (252-525 vs 169-437 days), standardised doses were higher (0.7-1.3 vs 0.5-1.0) and treatment was more likely to be changed (31%-46% vs 21%-34%) among patients with depression (9.1%-43%) than those with chronic pain.
conclusionAntidepressant use in older adults varied 24-fold by country, with the UK, which has the most conservative treatment guidelines, being among the lowest. Chronic pain was the most common potential treatment indication. Evaluation of real-world risks of TCAs is a priority for future research, given high rates of use and the potential for increased toxicity in older adults because of potent anticholinergic effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.