Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31092662›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Does cannabis legalisation change healthcare utilisation? A population-based study using the healthcare cost and utilisation project in Colorado, USA.

Francesca N Delling, Eric Vittinghoff, Thomas A Dewland, Mark J Pletcher, Jeffrey E Olgin, Gregory Nah, Kirstin Aschbacher, Christina D Fang, Emily S Lee, Shannon M Fan and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effects of Cannabis Legalization on Road Safety: A Literature Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Effect of pharmaceutical regulatory policy on health impact.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2020
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Assessing the public health impacts of legalizing recreational cannabis use: the US experience.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Francesca N DellingMedicine (Cardiology), University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Eric VittinghoffEpidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Thomas A DewlandMedicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Mark J PletcherEpidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Jeffrey E OlginMedicine (Cardiology), University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Gregory NahMedicine (Cardiology), University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Kirstin AschbacherMedicine (Cardiology), University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Christina D FangMedicine (Cardiology), University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Emily S LeeMedicine (Cardiology), University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Shannon M FanMedicine (Cardiology), University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Dhruv S KaziMedicine (Cardiology), University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Gregory M MarcusMedicine (Cardiology), University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the effect of cannabis legalisation on health effects and healthcare utilisation in Colorado (CO), the first state to legalise recreational cannabis, when compared with two control states, New York (NY) and Oklahoma (OK).

designWe used the 2010 to 2014 Healthcare Cost and Utilisation Project (HCUP) inpatient databases to compare changes in rates of healthcare utilisation and diagnoses in CO versus NY and OK.

settingPopulation-based, inpatient.

participantsHCUP state-wide data comprising over 28 million individuals and over 16 million hospitalisations across three states.

main outcome measuresWe used International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Edition codes to assess changes in healthcare utilisation specific to various medical diagnoses potentially treated by or exacerbated by cannabis. Diagnoses were classified based on weight of evidence from the National Academy of Science (NAS). Negative binomial models were used to compare rates of admissions between states.

resultsIn CO compared with NY and OK, respectively, cannabis abuse hospitalisations increased (risk ratio (RR) 1.27, 95% CI 1.26 to 1.28 and RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.17; both p<0.0005) post-legalisation. In CO, there was a reduction in total admissions but only when compared with OK (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.96 to 0.98, p<0.0005). Length of stay and costs did not change significantly in CO compared with NY or OK. Post-legalisation changes most consistent with NAS included an increase in motor vehicle accidents, alcohol abuse, overdose injury and a reduction in chronic pain admissions (all p<0.05 compared with each control state).

conclusionsRecreational cannabis legalisation is associated with neutral effects on healthcare utilisation. In line with previous evidence, cannabis liberalisation is linked to an increase in motor vehicle accidents, alcohol abuse, overdose injuries and a decrease in chronic pain admissions. Such population-level effects may help guide future decisions regarding cannabis use, prescription and policy.

Indexed as

Legislation, DrugAccidents, TrafficAdultAlcoholismColoradoFemaleHealth Care CostsHospitalizationHumansLength of StayMarijuana AbuseMarijuana UseMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareYoung Adultcannabis legalizationhealthcare utilizationhealth policy

Identifiers

PMID31092662
PMCPMC6530411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.