Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31092654›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2019

Kanuka honey versus aciclovir for the topical treatment of herpes simplex labialis: a randomised controlled trial.

Alex Semprini, Joseph Singer, Irene Braithwaite, Nick Shortt, Darmiga Thayabaran, Melanie McConnell, Mark Weatherall, Richard Beasley

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Efficacy of Lazolex® Gel in the Treatment of Herpes Simplex Mucocutaneous Infections and the Prevention of Recurrences: A Pilot Study.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Possible Potential Effects of Honey and Its Main Components Against Covid-19 Infection.Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alex SempriniMedical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-0949-0555
Joseph Singer
Irene BraithwaiteMedical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-5327-3027
Nick ShorttMedical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
Darmiga ThayabaranMedical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
Melanie McConnellVictoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Mark WeatherallUniversity of Otago Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Richard BeasleyMedical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare New Zealand medical grade kanuka honey with topical aciclovir for the treatment of herpes simplex labialis.

designProspective parallel randomised controlled open-label superiority trial.

setting76 community pharmacies across New Zealand between 10 September 2015 and 13 December 2017.

participants952 adults randomised within the first 72 hours of a herpes simplex labialis episode.

interventionsRandom assignment 1:1 to either 5% aciclovir cream or medical grade kanuka honey (90%)/glycerine (10%) cream, both applied five times daily. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was time from randomisation to return to normal skin (stage 7). Secondary outcomes included time from randomisation to stage 4 (open wound), time from stage 4 to 7, maximal pain, time to pain resolution and treatment acceptability.

resultsPrimary outcome variable: Kaplan-Meier-based estimates (95% CI) for the median time in days for return to normal skin were 8 (8 to 9) days for aciclovir and 9 (8 to 9) for honey; HR (95% CI) 1.06 (0.92 to 1.22), p=0.56. There were no statistically significant differences between treatments for all secondary outcome variables. No related serious adverse events were reported.

conclusionThere was no evidence of a difference in efficacy between topical medical grade kanuka honey and 5% aciclovir in the pharmacy-based treatment of herpes simplex labialis. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12615000648527;Post-results.

Indexed as

HoneyAcyclovirAdultAntiviral AgentsFemaleHerpes LabialisHumansKunzeaMaleMiddle AgedNew ZealandPharmaciesProspective StudiesWound HealingAcyclovirAntiviral Agentsaciclovircold soreherpes simplex labialiskanuka honeypragmatic trialrandomised controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID31092654
PMCPMC6530412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.