Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31092653›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Evaluating antibiotic stewardship in a tertiary care hospital in Kerala, India: a qualitative interview study.

Kelsey Baubie, Catherine Shaughnessy, Lia Kostiuk, Mariam Varsha Joseph, Nasia Safdar, Sanjeev K Singh, Dawd Siraj, Ajay Sethi, Julie Keating

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Hospital-based antimicrobial stewardship, India.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Reversing the Trend of Antimicrobial Resistance in ICU: Role of Antimicrobial and Diagnostic Stewardship.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Kelsey Baubie *Infectious Disease, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6027-7138
Catherine Shaughnessy *Infectious Disease, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Lia KostiukInfectious Disease, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Mariam Varsha JosephPharmacy, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Cochin, India.
Nasia SafdarInfectious Disease, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Sanjeev K SinghHospital Administration, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Cochin, India.
Dawd SirajInfectious Disease, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Ajay SethiPopulation Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Julie KeatingResearch, William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USAmrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre · INWilliam S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine what barriers and facilitators to antibiotic stewardship exist within a healthcare facility.

setting1300-bed tertiary care private hospital located in the state of Kerala, India.

participants31 semistructured interviews and 4 focus groups with hospital staff ranging from physicians, nurses, pharmacists and a clinical microbiologist.

resultsKey facilitators of antibiotic stewardship (AS) at the hospital included a dedicated committee overseeing appropriate inpatient antibiotic use, a prompt microbiology laboratory, a high level of AS understanding among staff, established guidelines for empiric prescribing and an easily accessible antibiogram. We identified the following barriers: limited access to clinical pharmacists, physician immunity to change regarding stewardship policies, infrequent antibiotic de-escalation, high physician workload, an incomplete electronic medical record (EMR), inadequate AS programme (ASP) physical visibility and high antibiotic use in the community.

conclusionsOpportunities for improvement at this institution include increasing accessibility to clinical pharmacists, implementing strategies to overcome physician immunity to change and establishing a more accessible and complete EMR. Our findings are likely to be of use to institutions developing ASPs in lower resource settings.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAntimicrobial StewardshipFocus GroupsHumansIndiaInterviews as TopicPersonnel, HospitalProgram EvaluationQualitative ResearchTertiary Care Centersantibiotic resistanceantibiotic stewardshipantibiotic stewardship programsIndiaSEIPS

Identifiers

PMID31092653
PMCPMC6530383
OpenAlexW2945673967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.