Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31092594›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2019

Detailed Analysis of the Characteristics of Sample Volume in Blood Culture Bottles.

Claes Henning, Nilsu Aygül, Patrik Dinnétz, Karin Wallgren, Volkan Özenci

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. In-depth analysis of sampling practice and yield of blood cultures.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Detection of relevant pathogens and contaminants in blood cultures after implementation of single-sampling strategy and initial specimen diversion.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Intermittent hemodialysis: a review of the top antimicrobial stewardship practices to be employed.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Unresolved issues in the epidemiology and diagnosis of bacteremia: an opinion paper.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The diagnostic value of next-generation sequencing technology in sepsis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Claes HenningSahlgrenska University Södra Älvsborgs Hospital, Borås, Sweden.
Nilsu AygülDivision of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Patrik DinnétzSchool of Natural Sciences, Technology and Environmental Studies, Södertörn University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karin WallgrenDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden.
Volkan ÖzenciDivision of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden volkan.ozenci@karolinska.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood volume is the most important variable for the detection of microorganisms in blood cultures (BCs). Most standards recommend 40 to 60 ml blood, collected in several BC bottles filled up to 10 ml. We measured blood volume in individual BC bottles and analyzed the associations of hospital, bottle type, day of the week, daily sampling time, and age and sex of the patient with sampling volume and BC result. The variation in blood volume per BC bottle was analyzed in a mixed linear model using hospital, bottle type, weekday, sampling time, age, and sex as fixed factors and patient identification (ID) and episode as random factors to control for repetitive sampling of individual patients. Only 18% of all bottles were filled with the recommended 8 to 10 ml, and 47% were filled with less than 8 ml. The mean (± standard error) volume was larger in positive bottles (9.09 ± 0.15) than in negative bottles (8.47 ± 0.07) (

Indexed as

Sample SizeAgedAge FactorsBacteremiaBacteriaBlood CultureCulture MediaFemaleHumansMaleMicrobiological TechniquesMiddle AgedPhlebotomySex FactorsCulture Mediablood cultureblood stream infectionsdetection of microorganismssample volume

Identifiers

PMID31092594
PMCPMC6663918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.