ArticleJournal of the American College of Radiology : JACR2019
An Initiative to Reduce Unnecessary Gadolinium-Based Contrast in Multiple Sclerosis Patients.
Article in Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three-Dimensional Deep Learning with Routine Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Data for Identification of Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Harmonized magnetic resonance imaging protocols for multiple sclerosis: HARMONY-MS, a pilot project.Journal of neurology · 2025Observational
- Automatic Active Lesion Tracking in Multiple Sclerosis Using Unsupervised Machine Learning.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Choroid plexus volume in multiple sclerosis can be estimated on structural MRI avoiding contrast injection.European radiology experimental · 2024Article
- Clinically Deployed Computational Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis Lesions.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- A Beginner's Guide to Arterial Spin Labeling (ASL) Image Processing.Frontiers in radiology · 2022Review
- The contribution of enhancing lesions in monitoring multiple sclerosis treatment: is gadolinium always necessary?Journal of neurology · 2020Article
- Magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of subependymal giant cell astrocytomas in follow-up of children with tuberous sclerosis complex: should we always use contrast enhancement?Pediatric radiology · 2020Article
- Automatic detection of lesion load change in Multiple Sclerosis using convolutional neural networks with segmentation confidence.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivePatients with multiple sclerosis (MS) routinely undergo serial contrast-enhanced MRIs. Given concerns regarding tissue deposition of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) and evidence that enhancement of lesions is only seen in patients with new disease activity on noncontrast imaging, we set out to implement a prospective quality improvement project whereby intravenous contrast would be reserved only for patients with evidence of new disease activity on noncontrast images.
methodsTo prospectively implement such a protocol, we leveraged our in-house computer-assisted detection (CAD) software and 3-D laboratory radiology technologists to perform real-time preliminary assessments of the CAD-processed T2 fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) noncontrast images as a basis for deciding whether to inject contrast. Before implementation, we held multidisciplinary meetings with neurology, neuroradiology, and MR technologists and distributed surveys to objectively assess opinions and obstacles to clinical implementation. We evaluated reduction in GBCA utilization and technologist performance relative to final neuroradiologist interpretations.
resultsDuring a 2-month trial period, 153 patients were imaged under the new protocol. Technologists using the CAD software were able to identify patients with new or enlarging lesions on FLAIR images with 95% accuracy and 97% negative predictive value relative to final neuroradiologist interpretations, which allowed us to avoid the use of contrast and additional imaging sequences in 87% of patients. DISCUSSION: A multidisciplinary effort to implement a quality improvement project to limit contrast in MS patients receiving follow-up MRIs allowed for improved safety and cost by targeting patients that would benefit from the use of intravenous contrast in real-time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.