Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31092348›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Radiology : JACR2019

An Initiative to Reduce Unnecessary Gadolinium-Based Contrast in Multiple Sclerosis Patients.

Jeffrey D Rudie, Raghav R Mattay, Matthew Schindler, Samantha Steingall, Tessa S Cook, Laurie A Loevner, Mitchell D Schnall, Alexander C Mamourian, Michel Bilello

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jeffrey D RudieDepartment of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Raghav R MattayDepartment of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Matthew SchindlerDepartment of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Samantha SteingallDepartment of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Tessa S CookDepartment of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Laurie A LoevnerDepartment of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Mitchell D SchnallDepartment of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Alexander C MamourianDepartment of Radiology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Michel BilelloDepartment of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: mbilello@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.

Funding

RESEARCH TRACK RADIOLOGY RESIDENCYT32EB004311 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Terence P Gade, Misun Hwang · 2005 to 2026
$4.5M
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB004311
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePatients with multiple sclerosis (MS) routinely undergo serial contrast-enhanced MRIs. Given concerns regarding tissue deposition of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) and evidence that enhancement of lesions is only seen in patients with new disease activity on noncontrast imaging, we set out to implement a prospective quality improvement project whereby intravenous contrast would be reserved only for patients with evidence of new disease activity on noncontrast images.

methodsTo prospectively implement such a protocol, we leveraged our in-house computer-assisted detection (CAD) software and 3-D laboratory radiology technologists to perform real-time preliminary assessments of the CAD-processed T2 fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) noncontrast images as a basis for deciding whether to inject contrast. Before implementation, we held multidisciplinary meetings with neurology, neuroradiology, and MR technologists and distributed surveys to objectively assess opinions and obstacles to clinical implementation. We evaluated reduction in GBCA utilization and technologist performance relative to final neuroradiologist interpretations.

resultsDuring a 2-month trial period, 153 patients were imaged under the new protocol. Technologists using the CAD software were able to identify patients with new or enlarging lesions on FLAIR images with 95% accuracy and 97% negative predictive value relative to final neuroradiologist interpretations, which allowed us to avoid the use of contrast and additional imaging sequences in 87% of patients. DISCUSSION: A multidisciplinary effort to implement a quality improvement project to limit contrast in MS patients receiving follow-up MRIs allowed for improved safety and cost by targeting patients that would benefit from the use of intravenous contrast in real-time.

Indexed as

Unnecessary ProceduresContrast MediaGadoliniumHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultiple SclerosisProspective StudiesQuality ImprovementContrast MediaGadoliniumBrain MRIgadoliniumIV contrastmultiple sclerosisprecision diagnosticsquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID31092348
PMCPMC6732018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.