Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31092281›Full record

ReviewClinical epigenetics2019

Circadian rhythms in the three-dimensional genome: implications of chromatin interactions for cyclic transcription.

Ignacio Pacheco-Bernal, Fernando Becerril-Pérez, Lorena Aguilar-Arnal

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical epigenetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Time-of-day defines NADNature communications · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ignacio Pacheco-BernalInstituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Departamento de Biología Celular y Fisiología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Fernando Becerril-PérezInstituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Departamento de Biología Celular y Fisiología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Lorena Aguilar-ArnalInstituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Departamento de Biología Celular y Fisiología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico. loreaguilararnal@iibiomedicas.unam.mx.ORCID 0000-0003-4473-4471
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circadian rhythms orchestrate crucial physiological functions and behavioral aspects around a day in almost all living forms. The circadian clock is a time tracking system that permits organisms to predict and anticipate periodic environmental fluctuations. The circadian system is hierarchically organized, and a master pacemaker located in the brain synchronizes subsidiary clocks in the rest of the organism. Adequate synchrony between central and peripheral clocks ensures fitness and potentiates a healthy state. Conversely, disruption of circadian rhythmicity is associated with metabolic diseases, psychiatric disorders, or cancer, amongst other pathologies. Remarkably, the molecular machinery directing circadian rhythms consists of an intricate network of feedback loops in transcription and translation which impose 24-h cycles in gene expression across all tissues. Interestingly, the molecular clock collaborates with multitude of epigenetic remodelers to fine tune transcriptional rhythms in a tissue-specific manner. Very exciting research demonstrate that three-dimensional properties of the genome have a regulatory role on circadian transcriptional rhythmicity, from bacteria to mammals. Unexpectedly, highly dynamic long-range chromatin interactions have been revealed during the circadian cycle in mammalian cells, where thousands of regulatory elements physically interact with promoter regions every 24 h. Molecular mechanisms directing circadian dynamics on chromatin folding are emerging, and the coordinated action between the core clock and epigenetic remodelers appears to be essential for these movements. These evidences reveal a critical epigenetic regulatory layer for circadian rhythms and pave the way to uncover molecular mechanisms triggering pathological states associated to circadian misalignment.

Indexed as

Circadian RhythmTranscription, GeneticAnimalsChromatinCircadian ClocksEpigenesis, GeneticFeedback, PhysiologicalGene Expression RegulationGenetic FitnessHumansOrgan SpecificityChromatinChromatinCircadian clocksEnvironmental epigeneticsGenome topologyTranscription

Identifiers

PMID31092281
PMCPMC6521413
OpenAlexW2945270938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.