Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31092249›Full record

ArticleHuman resources for health2019

Working in preventive medicine or not? Flawed perceptions decrease chance of retaining students for the profession.

Van Anh Thi Nguyen, Karen D Könings, E Pamela Wright, Hoat Ngoc Luu, Albert J J A Scherpbier, Jeroen J G van Merriënboer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human resources for health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Enhancing preventive medicine over curative medicine: Role of telemedicine.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2021
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Van Anh Thi NguyenDepartment of Medical Education and Skills Laboratory, Hanoi Medical University, 1 Ton That Tung street, Dongda, Hanoi, Vietnam. nguyenvananh@hmu.edu.vn.ORCID 0000-0002-3673-7288
Karen D KöningsFaculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, School of Health Professions Education (SHE), Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200, MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
E Pamela WrightGuelph International Health Consulting, Frederik Hendrikstraat 18, 1052, HT, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Hoat Ngoc LuuBiostatistics and Medical Informatics Department, Institute for Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Hanoi Medical University, 1 Ton That Tung street, Dongda, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Albert J J A ScherpbierFaculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, School of Health Professions Education (SHE), Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200, MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Jeroen J G van MerriënboerFaculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, School of Health Professions Education (SHE), Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200, MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecruiting and retaining students in preventive medical (PM) specialties has never been easy; one main challenge is how to select appropriate students with proper motivation. Understanding how students perceive PM practice differently from practicing doctors is necessary to guide students, especially for those for whom PM is only a substitute for medicine as their first study preference, properly during their study and, later, the practice of PM.

methodsOne thousand three hundred eighty-six PM students in four Vietnamese medical schools and 101 PM doctors filled out a questionnaire about the relevance of 44 characteristics of working in PM. ANOVAs were conducted to define the relationship between students' interest, year of study, willingness to work in PM, and the degree to which students had realistic perceptions of PM practice, compared to doctors' perceptions.

resultsOverall, compared to doctors' perceptions, students overestimated the importance of most of the investigated PM practice's characteristics. Moreover, students' perception related to their preference and willing to pursue a career in PM after graduation. In particular, students for whom PM was their first choice had more realistic perceptions of community practice than those who chose PM as their second choice. And, second-choice students had more realistic perceptions than first-choice students in their final years of study, but expected higher work stress in PM practice. Students who were willing to pursue a career in PM rated the importance of community practice higher than those who were not. We also found that students' perception changed during training as senior students had more realistic perceptions of clinical aspects and working stress than junior students, even though they overemphasized the importance of the community aspects of PM practice.

conclusionsTo increase the number of students actually entering the PM field after graduation, the flawed perceptions of students about the real working environment of PM doctors should be addressed through vocation-oriented activities in the curriculum targeted on groups of students who are most likely to have unrealistic perceptions. Our findings also have implications for other less attractive primary health care specialties that experience problems with recruiting and retaining students.

Indexed as

Career ChoicePreventive MedicineStudents, MedicalAdultFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesVietnamYoung AdultCareer choiceCharacteristics of specialtyFirst-choice studentsPreventive medicineStudent motivationStudent perception

Identifiers

PMID31092249
PMCPMC6521520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.