Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31092244›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2019

Development of a novel benchmark method to identify and characterize best practices in home care across six European countries: design, baseline, and rationale of the IBenC project.

Henriëtte G van der Roest, Liza van Eenoo, Lisanne I van Lier, Graziano Onder, Vjenka Garms-Homolová, Johannes H Smit, Harriet Finne-Soveri, Pálmi V Jónsson, Stasja Draisma, Anja Declercq and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. What Can We Learn from Studies of Medical Care in Other Countries?Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Adjusting Client-Level Risks Impacts on Home Care Organization Ranking.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Henriëtte G van der RoestDepartment of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, VU University medical center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081, BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. hg.vanderroest@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9898-923X
Liza van EenooLUCAS Centre for Care Research and Consultancy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Lisanne I van LierDepartment of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, VU University medical center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081, BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Graziano OnderDepartment of Geriatrics, Neuroscience and Orthopedics, Agostino Gemelli University Hospital, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Vjenka Garms-HomolováDepartment of Economics and Law, HTW Berlin, University of Applied Sciences, Berlin, Germany.
Johannes H SmitDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands & GGZ inGeest Specialized Mental Health Care, Research and Innovation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Harriet Finne-SoveriDepartment of Wellbeing, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Pálmi V JónssonDepartment of Geriatrics, Landspitali University Hospital, and Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Stasja DraismaDepartment of Wellbeing, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Anja DeclercqLUCAS Centre for Care Research and Consultancy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Judith E BosmansDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hein P J van HoutDepartment of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, VU University medical center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081, BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
IBenC project

Funding

FP7 Health 305912
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEurope's ageing society leads to an increased demand for long-term care, thereby putting a strain on the sustainability of health care systems. The 'Identifying best practices for care-dependent elderly by Benchmarking Costs and outcomes of Community Care' (IBenC) project aims to develop a new benchmark methodology based on quality of care and cost of care utilization to identify best practices in home care. The study's baseline data, methodology, and rationale are reported.

methodsHome care organizations in Belgium, Finland, Germany, Iceland, Italy, and the Netherlands, home care clients of 65 years and over receiving home care, and professionals working in these organizations were included. Client data were collected according to a prospective longitudinal design with the interRAI Home Care instrument. Assessments were performed at baseline, after six and 12 months by trained (research) nurses. Characteristics of home care organizations and professionals were collected cross-sectionally with online surveys.

resultsThirty-eight home care organizations, 2884 home care clients, and 1067 professionals were enrolled. Home care clients were mainly female (66.9%), on average 82.9 years (± 7.3). Extensive support in activities of daily living was needed for 41.6% of the sample, and 17.6% suffered cognitive decline. Care professionals were mainly female (93.4%), and over 45 years (52.8%). Considerable country differences were found.

conclusionA unique, international, comprehensive database is established, containing in-depth information on home care organizations, their clients and staff members. The variety of data enables the development of a novel cost-quality benchmark method, based on interRAI-HC data. This benchmark can be used to explore relevant links between organizational efficiency and organizational and staff characteristics.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingBenchmarkingAgedAged, 80 and overDatabases, FactualEuropeFemaleHealth Care SurveysHealth PersonnelHome Care ServicesHumansLong-Term CareMaleQuality of Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesBenchmarkingCosts of care utilizationCross-country comparisonElderlyHealth care policyHome careQuality of care

Identifiers

PMID31092244
PMCPMC6521361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.