ReviewJournal of pathology and translational medicine2019
Current Status of and Perspectives on Cervical Cancer Screening in Korea.
Review in Journal of pathology and translational medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Practice of Cytopathology in Korea: A 40-Year Evolution Through Standardization, Digital Transformation, and Global Partnership.Diagnostic cytopathology · 2026Review
- Mathematical Assessment of the Roles of Vaccination and Pap Screening on the Burden of HPV and Related Cancers in Korea.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2025Article
- Cervical cancer burden and trends in China, 2000-2020: Asia-Pacific international comparisons and insights for elimination goals.Cancer biology & medicine · 2025Article
- Metastatic Cervical Cancer in the Asia-Pacific Region: Current Treatment Landscape and Barriers.Cancer research communications · 2025Article
- Current state of cytopathology residency training: a Korean national survey of pathologists.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2023Article
- Local and Metastatic Relapses in a Young Woman with Papillary Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Current status of cytopathology practices in Korea: annual report on the Continuous Quality Improvement program of the Korean Society for Cytopathology for 2018.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2020Article
- Clinical management of abnormal Pap tests: differences between US and Korean guidelines.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2020Review
- Incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in Vietnam and Korea (1999-2017).Epidemiology and health · 2020Article
- Cytomorphological Features of Hyperchromatic Crowded Groups in Liquid-Based Cervicovaginal Cytology: A Single Institutional Experience.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2019Article
- Serum Human Epididymis Protein 4 as a Prognostic Marker in Cervical Cancer.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Since the introduction of the Papanicolaou (Pap) smear system in 1943, cervicovaginal cytology has been used as a standard screening test for cervical cancer. The dissemination of this test contributed to reductions of the incidence and mortality of cervical cancer worldwide. In Korea, regular health check-ups for industrial workers and their family members were introduced in 1988 and were performed as part of the National Cancer Screening Program in 1999. As a result, the incidence of cervical cancer in Korea has been steadily decreasing. However, about 800 cases of cervical cancer-related deaths are reported each year due to false-negative test results. Hence, new screening methods have been proposed. Liquid-based cytology (LBC) was introduced in 1996 to overcome the limitations of conventional Pap smears. Since then, other LBC methods have been developed and utilized, including the human papilloma virus test-a method with higher sensitivity that requires fewer screenings. In this study, we review current issues and future perspectives related to cervical cancer screening in Korea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.